The game is almost 30 years old. The Moiety Hive is literally the cover image.

They don’t need a spoiler tag.

I mean they are entirely different things. I’m not sure what kind of answer you are looking for.

It doesn’t seem like something adults enjoy? How on earth doesn’t it seem like adults enjoy it? Literally millions of adults enjoy it. How have you not noticed?

Because that is what the law says. What do you mean “how”?

Why does lacking the ability to see the future mean you can’t change someones mind about a prediction about the future?

Nobody else? But there is more than one person mentioning this to you.

Also why are you acting as if we are in the wrong if you are the one who misspoke?

What do you mean “just senile”? How can the only trait of somebody be that they are senile?

I very strongly recommend playing the original Riven prior to the remake.

Who are you talking about?

“Gamers” and “the players” is obviously much more broad a group than who you are discussing.

You think there aren’t any senile old men who are evil but are not narcissists?

Is it that you think senile old men are incapable of evil, or is it that you think all evil people are narcissists?

I didn’t really develop the characters in my hypotheticals, so I’m not sure how you have an idea of their cabinet or administration, but I appreciate your investment in the lore.

They said always.

Is the real view “I would rather have Biden than Trump?”

They should have written that then. This sub is better when people say what they mean.

Especially in titles

That wasn’t obvious to me at all. There is absolutely no indication of that. In fact you seemed pretty intentionally going broader than that. You said:

“I understand that rape is bad beyond the rhetoric that goes along with it, i just don’t see how that is different than literally anything else bad, you lose sense of bodily autonomy and sense of safety in every crime

Nonetheless I can just rewrite that whole thing and make it just violent crime. I actully only need to change one crime. Here:

“You don’t see how it is different than literally any other violent crime? You think it is no different than kicking someone in the shin? No different than committing a genocide of 10 million people? No different than throwing mustard packs at an old lady feeding ducks? No different than slapping the waitresses ass?”

Now the first one illustrated my point just fine, but I guess I needed to regardless. Not sure why I have to rewrote it a special way for you to respond to the actual point I’m making.

You don’t see how it is different than literally any other violent crime?

What does that have to do with the comment of mine which you are replying to.

Also you said you’d always rather have a senile old man as President, than a slightly less old man who is an evil narcissist.

You didn’t say “evil and a narcissist”

You said “evil narcissist”

Regardless though, ignore that example if you wish. Do you not get the point?

“Desires inspired by genuine compassion that lead to actions”

Can you elaborate on that? That is kinda vague if I am being honest.

  • “because they do it purely to psychological torment the victims for life”

What are you basing this on? They do it purely for that? No other reason?

So the intent being psychological torment is why you say being a rapist is the worst thing you can be?

Why is being a rapist worse than being a torturer?

And also why does the intent being psychological torment qualify it as being the worst thing?

I’d say that killing millions of people in the pursuit of ending a race you find undesirable is a worse intention than psychologically tormenting one person. But being a rapist is a worse thing to be than a genocidal mass murderer?

  • “The thing is i don’t believe people would be as psychologically tormented by it if there wasn’t this stigma and shame associated with it”

Maybe that is true. Maybe we would not be as bothered by murder or theft if we all thought differently also.

It seems you acknowledge that it is especially traumatic though.

What action would you consider to not be selfish?

You said you would always rather have a senile old man.

You said always but now are saying you are talking about “the here now”

So not always? Just this particular instance?

They said “always”

Also what is near impossible about these two?

“What if the senile old man was way more evil but just not a narcissist?”

“What if the evil narcissist was was a really amazing president?”