I see you are a connoisseur of the vast near-impossible possibilities. Cheers.
They said “always”
Also what is near impossible about these two?
“What if the senile old man was way more evil but just not a narcissist?”
“What if the evil narcissist was was a really amazing president?”
By the way I stated my view it’s clearly implied that the senile old man in question is not a narcissist. You’re proving nothing.
What does that have to do with the comment of mine which you are replying to.
Also you said you’d always rather have a senile old man as President, than a slightly less old man who is an evil narcissist.
You didn’t say “evil and a narcissist”
You said “evil narcissist”
Regardless though, ignore that example if you wish. Do you not get the point?