TGTS: "I'd say there is a greater than 90% chance all of us in #ufotwitter will owe @jaimemaussan1 an apology."
NewsORIGINAL SOURCE - https://x.com/GoodTroubleShow/status/1805766794420142097
People really don’t post the link a bunch of times, so thank you
Well I won't need to glad to say 🤗✌️♥️
Haha not me either I always believed!
Same here.
More than anything I'm just annoyed that we people who understood the serious nature of these bodies will get zero apologies from the people that insulted us constantly for believing in them.
this is where I wish we had markers on the debunkers en perpetuity ...
permanent loss of trust, and they earned it
Me neither!
ditto
Me too haha yeahhh we are gettin close
It was a stretch but the moment layers of tissue and bone were shown in the CT Scans I knew this was legit. Also we have to note how bad the “Elitism” was in other forums asking that this could only be verified by “American” scientists. Like, if Latin American science and their machines (the exact same ones used in the U.S) were not good enough. Really shameful to see that. I’m glad things are looking up for them however and they are getting redeemed.
The pictures they showed of the things in non-sterile "labs" and handling the bodies with bare hands did not help one iota in establishing that these were serious researchers studying these things.
That guy on Stated Clearly said he would never put out another video if this stuff were real. He went into a big speech telling exactly how they were made. "If this stuff is real I'll never do youtube again", he said. Something like that. The whole," If he gets elected I'm leaving the country" routine. But with aliens.
Jeremy Corbels crawlback will be the most satisfying to watch, especially as it'll be against his will. He so desperately wants to be the only UFO guy in town. So far he's given us nothing anyway.
Not me, I knew he was telling the truth the first time he displayed the mummies.
How about he apologizes for taking the helm knowing full well his past debunked mummies would severely hamper mummy disclosure. He could have stayed in the background at least at the start and it wouldn’t have been so heavily ridiculed especially in the UAP community. Not even trying to talk badly about him but his ego came first.
Lol “all of us” I love that.
It seems more promising, but I don't have anywhere near the expertise to judge the information that's come out. I don't think he does either. 90% is extremely high, with that being said.
It’s a big pill to swallow, a lot of people will owe a lot of apologizes once disclosure is a real thing. When you look what’s being found in Mexico as well that keeps getting similar cancel culture. I think the religious echos are feared. Maybe at some point we won’t judge and be able to forgive everyone for being human ;)
What constitutes your 10% doubt?
human error
Didn't one biologist who wrote a paper on the mummies pulled himself out from the paper recently and called the mummies are made from animal and human bones?
He did, but it was based on the fake ones and one of the real ones. His dismissal of the real one was actually due to how fake the other ones appeared and that the fakes simply got better with time. The real ones have yet to be dismissed or debunked. There is a peered review process currently happening between a few US universities.
correct...supporting the SA MIC instead of the truth
Steve Mera has been a BIG part of the mummy pushback too...not sure how many he's influenced
Michael Masters stated he's done with the mummies...so be it...
get the truth out there and let the debunkers and doubters land where they do
Why's that? Why do we owe him an apology.
Sorry, I love the topic but have no idea who these people are or what they do or have done.
He was involved in some hoaxes he presented before the mummies, so at the beginning of this whole ordeal everyone was sure they are fake, because he presented fakes before, doesnt matter what any of the scientists researching them said.
Boy cries Wolf Type a thing
He wasn’t involved in any hoaxes. Simply gullible and believed he had bodies before he had bodies. If he was a hoaxer, he would no get anything analyzed. This is one reason you owe him an apology
Damn...
Thanks for the extra comment!
I know people downvoted me to oblivion, but fellas, I just wanted more info, I just wanted to be more educated on this subject 🥲 why 🥲 I genuinely don't follow this stuff as much as I should, why is that my crime 🥲
Also his crime was essentially doing what 80% of UFO/aliens subs do?... Believing something to be true with no backing other than an interest and belief that they are real. Seems harsh.
I do get it though. So I'm glad he pushed for the testing. Whether it was to protect his own integrity, don't matter on the reasons.
He most certainly deserves an apology, he seems to be a victim as much as anyone else who gets scammed. He never created the hoaxes to begin with from what I read here... Which isn't what I heard initially. So damn.
Good on him 👍🏻
The "hoax" wasn't a hoax as I understand. It was someone trying to discredit one of the bodies just from a pic of a scan. Is that right?
Na he had a skull that looked weird. Got it analyzed and found out it was a deformed baby. But people won’t give him credit for investigating, they only remember when he believed it was an alien skull
Ooohhh, that's who this guy is. So he's just gullible, and people vilified him for that?
You’re not alone
Given his reputation and history of supporting hoaxes I would say it is unlikely. Maussan is either a fool fanatic believer or a willing participant in the promotion of hoaxes. I tend to believe it is a mix of the two. He is such a fervent believer that he accepts everything at face value ( this is the same man that claims he had a conversation with the famous painting of the virgin Mary in Mexico...).
His 30+ plus years record is against him and I would never advice someone with legitimate evidence to go with it to him. His reputation alone will instantly destroy the credibility of any evidence as real as it may seem.
Getting tricked by a hoax is not the same thing as perpetrating a hoax. People really need to use clearer language about this. Maussan has been searching for non-human remains/UFO evidence for his entire career.
When someone shows him a crazy looking skull that doesn't look human and says "this is a legitimate alien skull I got from X agency", and he thinks it might be evidence... until he gets it tested and finds out that it isn't... that isn't Maussan perpetrating a hoax.
If I asked to borrow $50 from you, and when you gave it to me I disappeared and never paid you back, would you say that you and I are both running a scam to steal money from people?
...or would you say that you got tricked by a scam?
Very important distinction! Maussan and other researchers like him are going out on a limb to find evidence, paying for material to study (sometimes from shady sources without being deterred by their origin) out of pocket just for a chance to discover the real thing. They are bound to encounter a hoax at some point and you can never be 100% sure when you first start studying a sample/ body/ whatever you’re looking at. Science thrives on new ideas and people daring to go beyond what’s already been established. We shouldn’t be ruining their reputations for that. Otherwise, we’re only harming progress and ultimately ourselves.
Because the skull being an alien is more plausible than a deformed human ?
I didn't say that, obviously it isn't "more probable", as we've never found any official remains of NHI. However, these guys have studied the phenomenon for their entire careers, they know that there are NHI. They know that they sometimes crash or otherwise leave behind remains. So of course they are searching for a thing that they know or strongly believe is out there...
3 missing replies
New? Watch this video, read our FAQ and drop by the Discord.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.