I've had some trouble starting and maintaining a stream when it comes to urinating. This is the only real symptom I have of a hypertonic pelvic floor, but I know that my history of high anxiety and tensing all my muscles for prolonged periods of time has left issues elsewhere in my body (teeth grinding, constrained breathing and neck tension). This is something I have dealt with, so a hypertonic floor wouldn't be surprising.
It's not always bad, but mornings can be pretty brutal, as I can often tell there is urinary retention going on and I have trouble with knowing what to do with my muscles to improve this.
I don't have other problems with my pelvic floor, so my doctor said it is likely mainly 'functional', meaning no obvious cause or obvious solution...
He suggested I get an ultrasound to determine if there is any retention going on, so hopefully that gives clarity but I am worried that I'll get a 'lucky' one and the test won't show what occurs especially in the mornings, and often right after sex.
Anyways, since I don't have many other symptoms associated with a hypertonic pelvic floor, I was wondering if others here had any similar experiences, any recommendations or ideas as to what can cause this isolated symptom to occur...
The reason mbti results are bad at predicting life outcomes is because the tests:
Plus:
The big five only has 5 measurements, whereas in reality type has 8 at least (each cognitive function since we all have all 8), plus the fact that the functions are utilized differently depending on their exact position makes the measurement itself much more complicated.
This, however, imo, makes the big 5 reductive since it only measures a few human traits and misses many others. It also has the issue of being vague (albeit less than mbti even). For example, openness can be many different things. One can be open to new experiences but less open to new ideas. People can be open with their emotions, open with their flexibility, with their decisions... The same applies to agreeableness. One can be agreeable because they are affiliative and default to social norms or they can be agreeable because they know that their opinions/thoughts/desires/preferences would be received poorly and not because it's natural for them to adopt social norms internally.
Cognitive functions are much more accurate at both describing and predicting behavior, but they are difficult to measure in a test due to their complexity. To create an accurate test is a dream of mine, but it would probably require much more programming than a test like the big 5 or 16p, which relies on percentages to determine fact, which always leaves room for inaccuracies.
It is unfortunate that most mbti tests do not even attempt to type based on functions (but rather do it based on dichotomies which do not accurately depict functions), meaning they will be inaccurate the majority of the time...
The big five is vague in reality, but it tries to be specific and concise which is temporarily making it look better than the 16 personality theories (which are inconsistent at best, since the community cannot agree on basic definitons of functions). It is my opinion, however, that this will change as the science develops and more accurate information is available and more widely accepted than it is currently.
Have you taken the Big 5 test? How do you think it relates/compares to your MBTI results?
entp