I'm sure you've never said anything mean spirited or derogatory ever in your perfect little fantasy life, huh?
He's confused. He's against direct democracy, which is valid, he just isn't saying it right.
I didn't TRULY need one, just thought it was funny there were so many girls in a row, and also having just one son with that many girls would make my next 100 years in game WAY easier lol.
Who gives a fuck! It's AMERICA BABY RAHHH!!! 🦅🦅🦅
Yeah it's a cadet branch. If I remember correctly, started, had two sons, firstborn had son while original ruler still alive, firstborn died, I played as second born, first born son was technically the leader of the dynasty, after seizing the throne and becoming King still not dynasty head, so I created a cadet branch.
Well, she's now 48 and the Queen of Sweden, so no more kids. My eldest daughter is the Queen of Syria. I did end up having one son, out of 9 children with her, and he will have many pressed claims upon succession lol
Ango-Saxon = Ew archaic tribal society
English = Based and civilized
I die on this hill.
Very true. It's honestly best scenario, in total I now have 9 children, 8 daughters and 1 son, and my wife is now out of pregnancy age. All is well for this succession.
That dude really thought he did something, posting that link
True. A fool I am, for blindly believing the word of a man of God.
OK that makes more sense. I thought I was crazy
So...why were my wife and I declared incestuous? CK3
My wife is the princess of Sweden, I'm English, got married, all was well.
About two years into the marriage a bishop claims we are incestuous and that we must end the marriage.
I refuse, fail a check, was declared incestuous by the church.
Wtf? I go back through our lineages and there's no relation. I get I failed a check, but can a bishop just randomly decide to say I'm incestuous with no proof? That's the part that that gets me.
EDIT: My bishop died under mysterious circumstances.
EDIT 2: Sweden, not Sweeden
It is not the duty of the president to kill American citizens. Even if they are terrorists. Nobody has that right. So your initial point is moot.
Are you just nitpicking individuals quotes? What are you trying to argue? It's well accepted that the court was referencing official duties, and thats it up to lower courts to determine what those duties are. SCOTUS did not define what the actions are. A lower court will.
Was the person a US citizen or not doesn't matter if it takes place on US soil. All individuals have a right to due process. Your whole point doesn't matter, because you're brushing aside what I said. Presidential immunity doesn't override the right of citizens laid out in the constitution.
Since you want to play semantics, yes, he has ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY IN THE SCOPE OF HIS OFFICIAL DUTIES. This does NOT equal blanket absolute immunity. HE MUST be performing a LAWFUL duty to have ABSOLUTE immunity. The assassination of an American is NOT A LAWFUL DUTY. The drone striking of a terrorist in Afghanistan that accidently kills a civilian is a LAWFUL DUTY.
In regards to communications with the DoJ, what specific communications are being referenced?
Do you understand now?
It frightens me, the ammount of people that think it's somehow legal to assassinate/murder an American citizen because they are declared a terrorist. Americans all have a right to due process. Even foreigners found in the U.S. Where the fuck are you all getting this from.
Even if you did. You cant assassinate a domestic terrorist. An American citizen still has a right to due process. Did everyone just forget how laws work?
Try responding to the other guy that actually answered your question, instead of the doomer you chose to listen to
You're missing my point. The order itself is already unlawful, and it is not an official duty of the president to kill American citizens, terrorists or not. Even a terrorist American has a right to due process. So, based on your example, it would be impossible for the president to declare a political rival a terrorist, and then assimilate them legally. Because the idea of that is fundamentally wrong. It can not happen. The president would be arrested following his impeachment, before or after this ruling, because it is not the official duty of the POTUS to act judge, jury, and executioner of American citizens
Familial kinslayer. My uncle killed my dad, so when I succeeded him I killed my uncle.
For the love of God woman, give me a son!
CrusaderKings