How do you know he's unarmed?

How do you know he's not? Are we just defaulting to shooting people because they might be armed?

UK is still in Europe. Unless they've done something really crazy

Just not 'technically' accurate

So not accurate. Claiming rape when it legally isn't is opening yourself up to a slam dunk libel case

A lawsuit that"d very likely be lost despite the legal definition of rape.

Most judges and juries would just toss it as nonsense

And you base this on what exactly?

I got a ring in there last night!

Medierne be like 

Nu er det nok ikke lige tilfældet her, og måske er det almen viden, men mange steder er skurene faktisk sat op og vedligeholdt af et firma der så til gengæld sælger reklamer på skuret. Kommunen får et gratis busstoppested og firmaet får en reklamesøjle, win/win.

Is that your way of saying you play Fortnite?

Wow, I didn't really get the scale until I realized those are 40mm fans, that's wild.

It's a yoke

It honestly made me understand why people don't just always follow lawful orders - that would've annoyed the shit out of me. Don't make me sit down for no reason, I'm giving you what you asked for

It wasn't at Mar a Lago though? It was a VA or DC airport

Skrid, du har ikke noget gummi!

Jeg føler mig altid lidt beæret når jeg får et tak-blink fra en lastbil for at give plads i min lille Twingo

som var størst

Og stadig er. Frekvensen er stadig langt højere for homoseksuelle mænd

Så vi ignorerer at han sagde "ellers får du en mere"?

Det kan være han tilbød ham tørre kanelgifler

'In your opinion' - I thought you just said it was objectively not sad. So it can't be a matter of opinion. So if this person feels it's sad, they must be wrong?

Saying a feeling is objectively not true is dumb. If they feel it's sad, it's sad to them. You don't feel that so you don't think that. That's fine. But saying something is objectively not sad is just wrong. Someone somewhere will find it sad

What is objectively sad? It's a subjective judgment and this person says it's one of the saddest photos they've seen. Are they wrong?

🤓

Fri bane indbefatter vel at der heller ikke er nogen af dém i vejen for en.

To win a defamation lawsuit, a public figure has to show that someone published false information with “actual malice,” or a reckless disregard for the truth. Quin said that’s why he needs the newspaper’s internal emails and the names of confidential sources, something journalists are loath to ever provide. The order asks that the materials first be handed to the judge, who will decide whether any of the evidence is relevant to a claim of defamation.

I think it's basically "show me what you have so I can see if you have evidence to say I embezzled". And because the court has ordered it, refusal could land you in jail. That's my understanding of it

Holy fuck it's happening

De 2000 ton er brutto, det reelle tal er 284 ton NEM, netto eksplosiv mængde. Det er hvad rapporten om ulykken kom frem til baseret på fabrikkens egen liste over lagerbeholdning. Tallet på 800 ton kommer tilsyneladende fra hvad der var på hovedlageret og er også et brutto tal

He forgot how to kick apparently