Source? I googled it and it seems to just be in the patent phase. That's very different from an intention to implement a plan.

Patents are just patents. A filed and granted patent isn’t the same thing as a concrete plan to actually implement the technology described in the patent. We could see this feature come to future Roku TV sets exactly as described, or we could never hear about it again. Everything from the cost of implementing the feature, to difficulty making it work in real life the way it works on paper, to user and partner backlash could dissuade Roku from putting this into practice.

source

I watch clips on YouTube all the time, especially the monologues for Seth Meyers, Jimmy Kimmel, and sometimes Colbert. I'm 37.

And isn’t it a betrayal, don’t you think? A little too treacherous, and yeah I really do think.

That's good to know. I might give season 2 a watch because it would be great to watch a show that recaptures more of that dark fantasy magic vibe and epicness.

That's fair. I mean, to each their own, and it's of course subjective. I appreciate the political thriller + fantasy angle and what they're trying to do. But for whatever reason, I was not able to emotionally invest in the story or characters. One thing I loved about Game of Thrones was the epic sprawling narrative set in multiple locations with a wide range of character types. HoD seems to lack that, along with Got's gritty edge.

I am right there with you. I thought HoD was very boring and uninteresting.

The dude probably had some kind of OCD and/or eating disorder

How did he learn to fly like that?

you should clearly do all of them, right? the idea that B has to be done first is ridiculous. is the question checking for bias? i forgot how strange these tests are.

I could see that. That part of the story was left unresolved for sure.

Right, cause Alfonso Cuarón is the arbiter of the definition of the science fiction genre itself, which has a notoriously long history of debate.

source?

Gravity is a fiction movie with a focus on scientific realism. The definition of sci-fi. How are you all confused about this. It's categorized as sci-fi by everybody.

Gravity is a fiction movie with a focus on scientific realism. The definition of sci-fi. How are you all confused about this. It's categorized as sci-fi by everybody.

I genuinely don't understand why I'm being downvoted. I was asking a rhetorical question and making a point that Gravity is clearly Sci-Fi. It's literally science combined with fiction. It's also listed as science fiction by any online database.

...so you think this movie is "science non-fiction"?

Edit: I will die on this hill.

Oh right, thank you! I updated the timeline.

Does it count if the character just disappears? On Friday Night Lights, Buddy Garrety becomes like a surrogate father figure for Santiago Herrera. Eventually he just disappears from the show in the middle of his character arc without any explanation and is never mentioned again. The actor talks about it on this podcast.

I do all the time

Omg, same. Sometimes my clients are like, "Wow that's so true, so helpful." And in my head I'm like, "You literally said it yourself like 2 minutes ago."

I try to focus on visualizing my thoughts. Like imagining concepts linked together on a map. It's easier for me to return to the image.

🎵I think we're in the Wizzzz🎵

Midnight Cowboy

thanks