So, autistic guy here, although i was only diagnosed as an adult, and before that i was just "that weird guy"...

As a kid, i used to hate going to the theater. I was easily scared, hated loud noises and felt extremely ansious whenever i was in a crowd(this last one is still true).

You know what my parents did if i started acting up? They would take me outside for a bit until i felt better. I'm sorry, but from what i gather, this parent thought it was more important to not miss any of the movie than it was to make the kid feel comfortable.

NTA, OP.

On a side note, i started to love going to see the movies as i got older, specially if i waited a week or two before going, and even more if i went alone. It just felt so relaxing to sit there without anyone or anything to distract me while watching a story...

Ok, first of all, sorry, i don't know the proper way to put a quote on reddit.

"Is that healthy for her other kids or does Reddit only care about Matt?"

Well, yes, at least for me. We know some things about Matt, at least enough for him to be a character (whether this is true or fake, it doesn't really matter here) in our heads. We know absolutely nothing about the other kids, except that there are three of them.

Is this the right way to think? Probably not. If anything, you're showing more empathy than me. But, for most people, that's like asking if Joe's mother would have taken them in. We know nothing about her, except that she exists, so we don't think about her for more than a fraction of a second.

I'm really curious about rule number 2, about not downvoting assholes, and about upvoting interesting comments. I actually try to respect this rule, meaning that sometimes i will give votes that go entirely against what i believe, so long as i find it entertaining. And, i mean, it does make me feel like a total AH at times, but i can see why the rule is supposed to work this way, so that all all the top upvoted answers won't simply be people agreeing with each other, sometimes even repeating the same things with slightly different words. So, yeah, it's a good rule. Too bad it's never followed.

Eh. Honestly, i always thought doing so in Sonic 2 was fairly easy. If you did it in the right order, you could even become Super Sonic before the first boss. No, it was Sonic 3 + Knuckles that always felt awful for me, specially since there were 14 of them.

The final stage of Sonic 2. Having to defeat two bosses (although the first one isn't particularly hard) with no rings is something i just can't do nowadays.

You know what? I think this is the one time Sanji would look at a woman and just nope out.

Best sequel for me has to be Super Mario 3. While i like Super Mario World better, 3 was such a step up from 2(japanese 2, aka the lost levels) that i just could not consider SMW as improving more than it's predecessor.

Worst? Easy, Tony Hawk's pro skater 5. The game was super buggy even with patches, and without them, it was pretty much unplayable, since the disk barely had anything in it. Not even joking, the patch was almost 2 gbs bigger than the base game.

Yeah... i truly love this game, but i could never convince anyone to play for more than a few days.

Dungeon Maker. It's fun to build the floors and then fight the monsters, and i like how the 2 main characters get strong by eating instead of by gaining XP. Too bet the pet has a much worse way of becoming stronger.

Do you mean limited saves or limited loading? Either way, permadeath is worse.

I work with radiography, so i have a lot of downtime at work, but have to ready for emergencies at any moment. So i usually play turn based rpgs, rom-hacks of older pokemon games being my favourite ones.

Imagine a rescue worker that is also willing to fight Hulk level villains to try and stall them until a super arrives. And yes, he is absolutely sure he will dies when doing so. This makes the fact that Saitama, the superhero that does arrive, acknowledges him as a true hero, all the more heartwarming.

Funny thing is, i used to dislike him until that story where he asks someone(a reporter, i believe) why he always made sure that the black guy and the asian guy that fought in his unity were always next to him in the center of the pictures. It was to make sure they couldn't be cropped from the pictures.

He's pretty much Spider-man if spidey had no powers but still fought crime. He never wins, but he will still be there, right in the middle of fights between beings that can easily destroy cities, doing his best to evacuate and rescue people, and more than once he fought said beings, AFTER a ton of powerful heroes were down, ready to die so that people could escape. He was pretty much a goner after a single punch, and then the monster kept pummeling him. This bought time for the strongest hero around to arrive and win.

Not sure if any of those count, but:

Fairy fencer F: Advent dark force -i suppose those are called otome games? I had to check Wikipedia. I enjoyed the story, despite it not being the best, and the combat was fun for me.

Immortal redneck, a fairly fun fps roguelite.

ZHP: Unlosing Ranger vs Darkdeath Evilman, kinda like a roguelite, i suppose? It's a NIS game.

Maybe? DE did work on unreal tourneament, so i'm not sure.

At that age, and even for a few years after, i'd probably have taken it out on everyone. Hell, i'd probably have found the mother and have some words for her as well.

Warframe. I'm ok with it.

... Just look at my username.

Doctor Hiriluk will never die, for he will never be forgotten.

Saints Row 2 was what got me into non-superhero open world games. I was nevever a fan of the GTA or True Crime series, or even the first Just Cause, but there was just something about this game that really caught my attention. I can't quite put my finger on it, but i've been playing quite a few open world games since then.

... Still not a fan of GTA, though.

Justice league. I was a fan of the comics from the 80's, so i was actually interested in watching it on tv. Honestly, i don't know what made me lose all hope first: the "documentary" style with interviews, the fact that the Green lantern was called Guy Gardner but acted and looked nothing like him, or how the Martian Manhunter looked. And it all went downhill from there...

It depends. Usually it's some open world game where i can just Mess around, usually something like Prototype or a Spider-man game, or even Assassin's creed. Or when i still want something quick, but more challenging, i'll play some levels in a Mario hack. Lately i've even tried a couple beginner level kaizos, but i can barely get a couple levels in.

For bosses that really get on my nerves, it's when they suddenly change the mechanics of the game for this one fight. Great examples would be the final bosses for the first Devil may Cry and for Drakengard, and at least in Drakengard 's case it was trolling, while normally it's played straight. It would work so much better to change the animations and make the atracks look stronger (but with the same timing, of course).

As for bosses that i like, while i know rpgs would normally be a strange genre to put here, since it's usually just about level grinding, i think most games of the Shin Megami Tensei series work well here, because in those you have to try with abilities that would normally be useless in other rpgs, like slow or attack down. In 99% of rpgs, normal enemies die quickly and bosses are immune to abilities like this. But here, even if they immediately remove them afterwards, it still makes them waste an attack to do so.

Finally, about fighting two or more bosses at once, i think most people have more fun when you can make them hit each other if you use some good positioning; instead of just being two normal bosses, only you fight them at once. Agni and Rudra from DMC3 are a positive example.

Cheating isn't a "mistake", and everyday you don't tell him is another day you made a conscious decision to lie. YTA.