As a man, yes.

Everybody has agendas, you included. Ominously calling out “people who have agendas” is a waste of words.

It doesn’t really cost anything to not be this huffed up about a non-issue. You aren’t the poser police.

It’s very unhealthy for a society to start calling anyone who does legal analysis a Nazi ally.

Officer please, I’m on my way to the national Tajik Gandalf impersonator convention. The Gaddafi convention is the other way 🥲

Maryland flag numbah #1 !!1

Shh dont ruin his racial purity fantasies

I mean Jewish culture in general was influenced by Hellenism at that point. My point is that if modern day Rabbinic judaism is recognized as a form of Judaism then there really is no reason not one cant do the same for Christianity since they both descend from old Israelite Jerusalem temple worship.

Most coherent Tankie.

I personally know two people who are ethnically Jewish who were raised Messianic so it isn’t wholly gentile evangelicals who are larping. Technically all Christianity is just Messianic Judaism.

You’re describing legal immigration not illegal.

Rankeans rise up!

I think it has to to more with force-fitting history into specific grand ideological frameworks rather than finely analyzing historical events on a case by case basis and without expectation of them being part of an overarching narrative oriented towards a specific telos.

“How unfortunate that the unwashed masses don’t listen to the same podcasts as I who has knowledge of the real functioning of things does”

This tbh

You say there isn’t a definition of sex in biology but your initial post that I responded to takes as a matter of fact that there is. You are free to provide a definition of sex that is more suited to your endeavor but until then I will operate on the most commonly understood view of sex at least in the EvoDevo sense. It is true that that not all human beings produce gametes but this is where notions like teleology come into play. I (and everyine else tbh) take as a matter of philosophical pragmatism that being “unhealthy” is a possibility. In this sense an “intersex” person (those individuals you perceived as exceptions that break down the sex binary) is simply someone who has a DSD (Disorder of sexual development). I.e. that someone who is commonly recognized as a “Male” and who cannot produce sperm is an unhealthy male. The same way I would view a person who was born without legs an “unhealthy” person. Now regarding gametal sexes, I don’t how else to put this so I cant help but repeat myself. A sex is a class of organisms whose “healthy” bodies produce a gamete. There are only two gametes. Therefore there are only two sexes. Not having ever produced gametes doesn’t make one a member of a third sex. It makes one an unhealthy member of either the male or female sex. An additional aside, you have very little knowledge of philosophy of science if you think “Scientific theories don’t get to have exceptions” is a relevant or meaningful statement given the context.

Courts don’t have scientific authority, correct. They have legal authority. However they take science into consideration when forming legal opinions. In humans we actually do have two (and only two) reproductive roles determined the gametes we produce as I’ve explained. We only produce sperm and ova. Therefore there are only two sexes. I’ve acknowledged that in the deep time future one can speculate on theoretical reproductive roles that may emerge but for now (and the past few million years) Humans only have two sexes. There is no third gamete. There is no “imbetween” gamete.

This is honestly one of the most pseudoscientific things I’ve read in a long time and rooting trans rights in this sort of neo-Lysenkoism is terrible for them in the future when people actually have to use rigorous arguments in courts of law where this kind of mumbo jumbo just won’t fly. Sex as an evolutionary phenomenon is defined by reproductive role. “Male” refers to that class of organisms whose healthy members produce the small gamete and likewise for “Female” in the production of the large gamete. There are only two gametes (among humans). If billions of years from now a third gamete were to evolve then sure there would be more than two sexes but then it would still be a “trinary” not a spectrum. As of yet though sex is still binary in humans.

If I were a Christian or Jew living in Palestine around the time of Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan and I enter this mosque, I would think it passive aggressive to notice that the constructors went to great efforts to carve condemnation of my beliefs into stone.

I think you may have just answered your own question

But it’s not about her alone, it’s also about the kid who got his heart broken. Her brother is actually quite honourable for realizing the moral complexity of the situation.