The natural law argument against same-sex behaviour (as I understand it) is that homosexual acts contravene the telos of the human sexual faculty since they don’t lead to procreation and are therefore immoral. Why can’t one simply respond to this by saying that gay people are a unique class of human beings in that the telos of their sexual faculty is oriented towards well.. same-sex behavior? In other words why cant one posit that the “form” of a gay person is different from that of a straight person and thus their telos?