Badloss
1
:Creuss: The Ghosts of Creuss

It's weird sometimes, I was locked out without logging in but then it did pop up when I tried on a different device. No idea why Twitter sometimes lets you view tweets and sometimes it doesnt... and to be fair I doubt anyone that works at twitter knows either

Badloss
1
:Creuss: The Ghosts of Creuss

Mahact starts with bio stims and they're already one of my favorites mmmm

Badloss
1
:Creuss: The Ghosts of Creuss

I like that because DET depends on how available the frontier tokens are and whether you can get to them. The retreat feature isn't really enough to justify getting the tech so this is a nice perk for somebody that doesn't have any asteroids near them but needs a blue tech

Quietly, though. Those people are cowards and they'd never do it publicly like this until Trump convinced them they'll be safe to show their ugliness to the world

Meanwhile the US probably has him in live 4k from a satellite and they're taking bets on whether the drones find him or not

The US has been giving Ukraine all of their Cold war leftovers to clear out depots so they have more room for the good shit.

The US isn't going to reveal what it can actually do until somebody tries attacking them for real, until then they can just keep quietly winning wars with 40 year old equipment and pretending that's all there is

How do you play nanites without getting fucked by war exhaustion? Every time I'll throw 2000 nanite ships at someone and immediately go to 100% war exhaustion

They do have this with the covenants, they just need to expand them

I was wondering where your personal connection to this was coming from. It makes a lot of sense that you think this kind of behavior is okay when you grew up in it.

It's pretty pointless to keep going in circles on this, you're legally free to hang around all the playgrounds you want. We're just legally free to think you're sketchy while you do it.

Like I said in my other reply, If you're doing this level of mental gymnastics to justify your relationship... It's probably not appropriate.

Again, if you're the kind of person that really knows in depth what the age of consent laws are, that says an awful lot about you.

To "answer the question" ... Yes, it is bad. The reality of the legal system and the law is that we have to draw an arbitrary line somewhere, but coming right up to that line and bragging about how you didn't go over it is not something to be proud of and it's pretty gross. Be better than the bare minimum.

Like I said in my other reply, If you're doing this level of mental gymnastics to justify your relationship... It's probably not appropriate.

You're the one trying to use the term victim blaming while simultaneously insisting that nothing bad happened... I think you might need a dictionary here yourself.

Dating a high schooler in your 20s is creepy no matter what the letter of the law says. This is like when transformers awkwardly decided to explain Romeo and Juliet laws in the middle of the movie... If you have to try this hard to justify the age of consent and how totally not creepy your relationship is, that means it's inappropriate

The whole reason we have a distinction between adults and children is that children don't have the reasoning developed to make good decisions. A teenager literally does not have the brain function yet to figure out that they're being groomed and they're not special and that they're being preyed on by a predator.

It's pretty creepy that you're taking the side of the pedos on this one, you might want to rethink this stance

Edit lmao what the fuck is this

Just because you weren't legally an adult at 17, doesn't mean you can pass the blame off to someone else when you made a conscious decision to do something that you now regret. That is victim blaming. Take some responsibility. Like an adult.

Youre saying the teenager is victim blaming the adult for taking advantage of them? What?

if you think about it you'd probably only get like 20 bucks at most, really not worth participating in that kind of scramble. Nobody is getting significant money out of that

because people enjoy fantasizing about what they'd do with a ton of money and we're all entertained reading the answers?

Reddit has a voting system, if the content rises to the top it means the community wants to see it. Sorry that you're disappointed, maybe you can come up with some better prompts and if they're good then the repeats will get pushed down

That's what I'm saying, you can pick any stretch of 30 years in the history of the S&P and the end will be higher than the beginning.

You can't do this for 5 or 10 year stretches. Market downturns are real and you can lose a lot if you need to sell and get your money back too early.

The power to destroy a thing is absolute control over it

-Paul Muad'dib Atreides

Green is mean, Ice is nice

I think I heard once that somebody intentionally lied while naming them so people wouldn't realize Iceland was the nicer one

I have horrible eyesight and would have been completely fucked if I was born any time other than the last 200 years or so

I have plenty of time, you just aren't worth it :)

Again declare victory if you need to feel validated, but I've got other things to do

I didn't answer your question because I didn't feel like it. That's not some signal that you won an internet fight or I don't have an answer, it's just not worth my time to get dragged into an argument that I don't feel like having.

I don't owe you a discussion, sorry

It doesn't seem likely that Apple would change their manufacturing processes to include ethically sourced cobalt, either.

I'm not defending Apple but I doubt the customers are ready for $3000 iPhones either. We love to criticize the unethical methods that keep our stuff cheap while we simultaneously keep buying it because it's cheap

The white person part is that the cop didn't shoot him for no reason, that's the privilege at work