If you say shit that would lead folks to fight, you may be prosecuted under the statute listed. Otherwise, you're welcome to say what you wish (unless otherwise bounded).

Replying up here so more folks can see it:

That is not what "fighting words" laws are. They are laws that criminalize speech known to the accused as likely to provoke. They are often part of a state's disturbing the peace offence, as is the case in California (California Penal Code § 415). The fighting words doctrine asserts that such conduct is not protected by the first amendment and is open to states to criminalize.

For more information, see this helpful page from the Free Speech Center at MTSU.

And OC, it's disgraceful to hide this commentary so you can continue to mislead folks.

Some states are funny. Kentucky, despite having a state legislature with a Republican super majority (80-20 House, 31-7 Senate), has only had 3 Republican governors since WWII.

Also, if you want a really weird moment in American politics, look at the 2002 Gubernatorial Elections

That is precisely correct.

That is not what "fighting words" laws are. They are laws that criminalize speech known to the accused as likely to provoke. They are often part of a state's disturbing the peace offence, as is the case in California (California Penal Code § 415). The fighting words doctrine asserts that such conduct is not protected by the first amendment and is open to states to criminalize.

For more information, see this helpful page from the Free Speech Center at MTSU.

Edit: lololol downvote all you like; this is the law in most states (I have neither the time nor inclination to learn the entire criminal law of all 50 states).

British elections are like a man dancing with a horse...

I have absolutely no idea what's going on.

Reddit pitbull owner avoid irresponsible ownership, difficulty level: impossible

Ffs keep your dog on a leash

Do you come with the inanimate carbon rod?

It's possible, but judges in Oklahoma don't run for office; they're appointed by the governor.

(And through a cursory search, I could find nothing as to his political membership)

Is that an inanimate carbon rod in your pants or are you happy to see me?

This isn't "new law." It's new policy. You have always been required to submit to a breath sample on request. This is simply the department deciding to test everybody rather than selectively test.

This

Wow. Congratulations. This is the worst thing I've seen all day.

Fencing, where we know how to handle losses with dignity and grace.

Because if you act like this in my sport, you'd get instantly disqualified from the immediate competition and sanctioned as to your ability to participate in future competitions. This is clear-cut unsportsmanlike conduct.

That's not the Wright Brothers' plane. It's a Curtiss JN or "Jenny." The stamp is known as the "Inverted Jenny."

Well you do need at least 4 peanuts per joe

Did you hear!? Homer's a critic!

Alternatively:

[GIF] 

Is this to what you are referring?