Anyone who tries to deny people voting, or makes it harder to vote, does so because they know the will of the people is against them.

It's what you implied. Otherwise, what's the point of saying it? Or was that a Freudian slip?

So it doesn't matter if you're a bastard, just if you can knock someone out for calling you on it?

"This is a hospital! Where are all the sick people?!"

"We don't keep them in the lobby, sir!"

That depends on if you call what we do "living."

That's not surprising. I'm never sure if it's a matter of they're hoping for an opportunity to use it, being too scared to go outside without it, or out of sheer stubbornness and spite

They're able to do whatever they want because the conservatives will shield them, even if they know what they've done because they think the police are all that stand between them and danger. They need to see that they should be more afraid of the police

This is one of those instances of using the same words and speaking a different language. You know how when you speak to someone from a far-right Muslim country and they get offended when you suggest that they don't care about nor respect their women (how can you say that? Of course we love our women!), and... well, you see how women are treated in those countries. American conservatives have a similar relationship with their children (and many with women also, let's be real)

So how does this make sense? For both of them, they care about women and children for what they are. What they are is property. Basically livestock. Why are the far-right so uptight about women having bodily autonomy? It's my child; you're just the incubator. You don't get to decide what happens to my property. Your kid thinks they might be gay? I will not allow my property to embarrass me like that. They're as dismissive of women and children having more rights as they would be for giving more rights to their dog.

Reactionaries are all about living in the past, and conservatives as a rule are very fear-motivated, so that tracks

It does help to have weapons that aren't dependent on a particular kind of damage, say if you're under a chaos curse. Still niche though. Eh

Let's be real. It's only if you're "free-ranging" your kids that you need to deprive everyone of [x] if you don't want your kids "exposed to dangerous ideas." Movies, video games, books, porn, it doesn't matter. If they can't be bothered to parent their kids, but still want to make sure they don't come across something that will influence them to be anything other than their good little drones, they need to take it from everyone.

It just occurred to me that what scares them isn't stuff that could actually hurt them today. They're scared of cold war era stuff. The government doesn't need to physically track you; your phone does it for them. They don't know enough of modern dangers to be scared of them, and what they are scared of is just idiotic. 5g towers are poison, phones are radioactive, etc

It's just ignorance on their part. Oh, they can fit a microchip in there, yeah? I've seen the needles they use to chip pets; that gauge of needle looks more like a leather punch. If it doesn't look like you could add holes to your belt with it, you're not getting a microchip through it.

It goes to show that the right doesn't care about kids. Real parents are involved in their kids' lives enough to steer them away from what they shouldn't see. Denying something to everyone only makes sense for people who legitimately can't answer where their children are when it's 3am.

This is a smoke screen. "It's for the children-" no, it's not. This is a trick for us to dox ourselves. It's tying your ID to your IP. This is a worse conspiracy in reality than the "they're tracking you with the vaccine" nonsense was in fantasy land.

Pick your poison. The democrats are corrupt, and the republicans are tyrannical. It's why we'll never have parties that actually represent anyone but the wealthy

It's big brother stuff; it's a way to get our names tied to our online activity and tricking the republican base to accept it without question. Normally, they'd be in conspiracy mode, but it's for the children, you see

The US is the 2nd little pig; Europe is the 3rd

I guess to people other than Mel, Eris is (basically) the goddess of social drama. There are a lot of shitty people out there who will go out and start something because they don't feel right unless their lives are complicated. Her followers would probably include the girls who get mad that their exes didn't chase them after they broke it off

I can afford to pay my mortgage with 1 roommate as compared to 3 or 4

Adult theaters will be the speakeasies of our generation. We're already poorer than people in the great depression, so it seems appropriate.

Didn't hear about Jackson. I was talking about Kavanaugh and Barrett

How many of them are over-representing far-right interests? Hell, weren't the last two a rape apologist/drunken frat boy and a cultist stepford wife?

Party of law and order! Yay...?