So these are often lauded as solarpunk reading...and after reading them I'm BAFFLED at that notion. Did I miss something?

They are good books. Very good books in fact. They are prescient, and fascinating books considering when they were written. The prose is solid. The characters are compelling.

I just don't see how they fall remotely under solarpunk. Lauren has a single conversation with her friend about using wild seeds as food, and the concept of a rural community away from the chaos....that's it. There's nothing else here that feels like anything but apocalyptic, and post-apocalyptic. Going to space/other planets because earth is ruined is not very solarpunk to me either. I also feel like replacing a brutal Christian theocracy with the Earthseed religion is not a good thing. The book feels like it was written by a Christian who had a crisis of faith, leaned agnostic for a time, and then created a religion that used tenets of Christianity to wrangle people under another false set of rules and behaviour. Lauren essentially becomes the thing she's fighting against....leaving "god" in her tenets of her book is what says that to me.

I dunno. I just guess I was expecting the BRTUAL end of the world she portrays in her book (in all its grim dark 90's glory) to be juxtaposed against the founding of an ACTUAL solarpunk community and vibe. It never ever feels like that, and the second book dives even HARDER into that usnure-of-what-it-wants-to-be nature of the first book with various characters who live in that Christian theocracy trying to straddle the line between that and Earthseed...

Like I said, great books, but I don't think it should be recommended as Solarpunk reading. I don't need solarpunk to have no visceral and juts be about happy communities living off the land and nature...but it should at least have SOME of the solarpunk notions in it.

Guess I gotta go back to KSR for this type of thing.