Same getting the highest fps with the highest graphics possible, a bit of tinkering in settings but once you got that it truly is beautiful, looking at you Cyberpunk
Same with my Laptop, luckely i have a pretty powerful cpu inside, Ryzen 5 5600X with increased TDP from 65W to 88W and also the most powerful RTX 3060 laptop Version at 115W i get a Solid 60-80FPS in all except raytracing cranked to the max
I go for as high details as I can while maintaining a decent frame rate. I didn't spend the money on a good GPU and a large 4K OLED monitor to play games with the lowest graphic settings possible lol
multiplayer - blue violet (I like my graphics. but if visual clutter and lower fps is going to put me at a huge disadvantage I'll lower it or disable it just enough to keep the game pretty.
i5-10300H GTX 1650 (Laptop) with 16 Gigabytes of RAM
6d
Red, although it does depend on the game. I tend to prioritize graphics, then performance, and then resolution. I crank the graphics up, but then reduce resolution to get the performance back up
Somewhere in between. Usually just turn everthing to max and just dial down diffrent settings so I can get an acceptable fps, but all in all it depends on the game.
I'm not picking an idiotic side. I enjoy tweaking settings until I get the best FPS cost to performance ratio while maintaining a consistent and acceptable framerate.
I aim for 60 FPS and I can tolerate dips down to 50. Lower than that and I start tweaking. Got a 3060 so today that's 1080p high/medium and DLSS is definitely getting involved. I don't play any new releases so I'm thankfully skipping the UE5 onslaught of GPUs these days.
I’m on an Acer Aspire A514-55 76Z4 (i7-1255U, 16GB 3200MT/s LPDDR4) with a Razer Core X Chroma eGPU & RTX 2060 Super (thanks to Linus’ video from a few years back teaching me about eGPUs 🙏)
Still on team blue though, can’t even run Elden Ring at 720p 60FPS with DLSS mod. Might need to try FSR 3 with AFMF
I need a minimum of 60fps and a preferred 120, a few settings that are necessities (render distance), and a few settings that be damned(motion blur, depth of field).
I either tinker with the settings for 10mins or 10seconds
Depends. I don't have a latest and greatest PC now, so I have to lower the settings in order for some games to look good enough. Like Alan Wake 2 and Hellblade II. I like to lock my FPS to whatever maximum stable FPS I get, unless it's a first person shooter.
I don’t care about high FPS, I care more about having a steady FPS even when arriving to dense and taxing areas. I also don’t want 30FPS for example (Bloodborne is a game I want to go back to play but can’t bring myself to)
For me 60-70, never dropping below 60 is good for me, but if the game hits 85 in some areas and drops to 55 in some areas (starfield) then I drop my settings a lot so I can not notice such a drop in performance.
I have been PC gaming since the 90s, so i will always be team red. I love eye candy, and even in PvP games I never did shit like disable vsync or turn down all settings like people used to do during the CS beta/1.6/Source era. I also am in the demographic that plays tons of single player games, and i have a distinct memory of playing Oblivion when it first dropped with a target FPS of 30fps at 1280x800 HDR (no AA since NVIDIA couldnt do the HDR and AA simultaneously back then).
It's a balancing act, high graphics with high fps would be best otherwise reasonable graphics with reasonable fps. It's also really dependent on the game.
I have a 4090 but all the guides on COD say to turn off all grafx for fps 😂 I gotta turn some on and check my actual fps / latency to see if I’m only allowed to play w Nintendo grafx or my rig can actually perform 😂
Im more of a configuring the setting to get good fps and still have great graphics. Like i will turn of things i dont really need (Looking at you motion blur, bloom, lens flare and depth of field) just to limit the graphics so i can boost the fps i get or make the game run smoother
I've found a lot of AAA games, even on low, still have pretty solid quality actually. Played Like a Dragon on low and I was expecting it to look like old school roblox, but most game are still very clear
Target 60, because thats my monitors refresh rate. If I can hold it all is well. If I cant I lower things a bit, see what the best compromise is that gets me back to 60.
depends on the game. some games dont need high fps to enjoy but having them look nicer is kinda nice to have. some games demand max fps to fully enjoy.
Laughing in rimworld... Game uses only 1 thread. You can have a computer suitable for realtime 4k multicam video editing, and still have 3fps when a 100+ppl raid hits, and they start throwing molotovs... How I both hate and love that game at the same time. Graphics always shit tho.
How low is low? if its just 60 then I'd go with Red. If Red gow below 60 then I won't play the game. I don't really enjoy Low graphics. Im an RPG gamer so immersion is important to me, sounds, music graphics, environment design and characters.
I play on my TV which is 60 Hz. And I only play single player story based titles. So I don't much care about GPS. In fact, I was playing Alan Wake 2 at around 30 FPS and didn't even notice for the most part till I measured it.
So I increase the visual quality till the point where I start noticing the stutters.
Team purple?