View all comments
I hate to tell you this but babies can't survive on their own outside the womb. Can I kill them?
Religion has nothing to do with it. Google "when does human life begin"
Any imputation to the contrary of "abortion kills babies" is straight up anti-science and mental gymnastics.
Man, this is the easiest topic to defend.
And you reply with yet another intentional misrepresentation, as if there was any doubt you were arguing in bad faith.
You know full well there's a context for "survive" there, but you have to lie about it to pretend to have a point.
What about science saying human life begins at conception, what say you to that.
I say (for the last time as you're a lying bore wasting my time) that you're lying yet again, and you wouldn't know science if it bit you.
You are intentionally conflating "human life" with "A human life" and they are not the same scientifically nor legally. Cancer cells are human. The newly-divided cells in my left ass cheek are human. Neither can survive minutes outside the body and neither have any innate rights. Those ass cheek cells are alive and contain dna sufficient to grow a whole human but scratching them off isn't "immoral" let alone abortion.
Whatever gray area there is between conception and a baby capable of breathing by itself, there is definitely time where the zygote is human but not A sentient human. It has no mind, has never had one. It cannot survive any time beyond the womb. And it should have few if any rights beyond those of cancer cells or ass cheek cells. Good luck coming up with any sane examples of such rights, that don't conflict with actual science or that conflict with law to the degree you're de facto advocating for slavery / government-mandated uses of people for medical purposes without their consent.
"a zygote is a human but not a sentient human"
If you were to fall into a coma for say.. 9 months, and it's guaranteed you'll become conscious again after that 9 months, is it okay to kill you during that time?
We're done talking. You know full well your "points" are nonsense or have been refuted elsewhere, frequently by "actual science" and not your intentional misrepresentation of it. Go lie somewhere else.
Would be nice if you answered the question. But I knew you wouldn't.
"a non-sentient clump of cells that's never had a coherent thought is exactly the same as me ... Uh ... As a person who's actually had years of life as a sentient being. I are so smrt" - u-DawnToDuck
"Hnnngh ... Hnnngh ... Hnnngh" - the sound of u-DownToDuck ignoring the actual content of peoples' comments while moving the goalposts.
I thought we were done talking? If you recover from.. whatever that comment was - feel free to answer my question directly. Otherwise, concede defeat. Or just keep imagining me making weird noises.. either way.