"Incluir nos boletins de voto a opção de “voto em branco”"
Então e se... Simplesmente votares em branco?
Se o caso for muito muito bom claro. E se ganhares maior parte vai para o advogado
Nos EUA há advogados que a única coisa que fazem são casos destes. Se o caso for bollm eles aceitam sem cobrar
I'm not sure if saying "We need more beer in this room" in church a great idea
!delta
You convinced me how having a more malleable law could be more benefitial (with the Brown v Board of Education case)
!delta
You've convinced me the proposed solution wouldn't be sufficient to solve the problem, and thank you for wording the problem better than I did.
Intent is an assertable fact so it would be like asking "did he mean to do it?" "If so, was it for personal interests?"
And we could pay the commission with public money, or if the accused turns out to be guilty the burden would be on him, and we already kinda have independent commissions in the form of investigators
Of course the outcomes shouldn't be the same. And yes, asserting the facts is a large part of the process, but this stage could be more impartial, like having an independent commission.
By objective I don't mean that doesn't care about particularities of each case, I just mean that given a set of facts, the outcome is predictable. So it would be considered if it was self defense or not, because that's one of the facts that would be taken into account.
I agree that a computer wouldn't be able to differentiate between particular cases. But still, I believe the law should be so straight forward that once the facts are asserted the outcome of the trial is more or less predictable.
No, I was just an example of a case where it was more than proven that someone committed a crime but some people continued to support them. But yeah, thinking about it it wasn't the best of examples, sorry. My point was that even if it was more than proven that Trump did anything some people would still support him.
I would disagree about having committed that fallacy, I was just using the Nuremberg trials as an example of an instance where the wrong doings of someone were more than proven but still some people continue to support them.
How come it is harassment to investigate him?
Of course there will always be people that defend him. There were the Nurenberg trials but some people still defend Nazi Germany.
We like to think of people as either being die-hard Trump supporters or completely anti-Trump, but there's a lot of people in the middle. These are the people that sway elections and whose opinion may be swayed by the outcome of the Mueller investigation.
Assuming believing some race is superior to another is an inherently wrong idea, which I believe is, but that's also another possible point of contention, do you believe it should be prohibit people saying it just because of that? So should we prohibit people from saying the earth is flat?
Ultimately, I believe the answer is no. In both cases no one is hurt because you believe it, so why prohibit it?
It's an historical artifact that has little purpose nowadays. Actually, the founding fathers' intention was for the president to be indirectly elected by the state legislatures, as in, the state legislatures would send out representatives to vote for president (these representatives making up the electoral college). Also, senators were also originally appointed by state legislatutes
Yes, not holding a vote would have been much more undemocratic. But that's not the question. Is it more undemocratic to have a president that didn't win the popular vote or setting minimum standards for who is eligible to be president? That's the question.
You can never forget the one and only, emplastro .
James Mattis, December 8
After this 60 minutes interview, it's just a matter of time.
In Portugal the epsilon delta definition is thaugt in 11th grade actually (although mostly just as as a curipus fact). And in some universities the introductory calculus courses are named 'Analysis 1, 2, etc.', and cover all the way up to differential equations (although some universities have renamed the courses to have more meaningful names like 'Calculus I', 'Calculus II', 'Differential Equations').
Free new book on Measure Theory and Functional Analysis by Sheldon Axler (author of Linear Algebra Done Right)
math