wdym passive

not as efficient as lithobreaking

There are no such distanced endeavors.

Someone has to build the talent-packed teams. It never happens despite someone. Most often it doesn't happen even with soulbreaking effort.

There are plenty talent-packed teams with no outcome to show for it. And plenty talentless teams.

You just need to re-evaluate your relationship with reality. If your opinion does not match your sampling of reality, then your opinion is likely the problem. If you think groundbreaking teams spuriously happen in the most hostile place for them to exist, then I would claim that is unsustainable thought.

* isn't

Never understood the allure of big yacht. Being gagillionaire I would want like nuclear airborne fortress.

It's Tesla shares. They are already pre-"invested".

It's not about needs of one person. Indeed anything above like $100M is not a reward, but burden\full-time job.

Company shares is not money you spend on your necessities. The problem is you are looking at it as if it is a pocket money being given out, and that is spendable.

Instead think of it as someone being elected to do a job, and being given the tools to perform it. It is not like Elon Musk now wants to buy 56B worth of ice-cream. It rather means he was entrusted with 56B worth of infrastructure of our society to manage.

Not leaving politics aside about taxation, imagine net worth would be taxed. That either means companies implicitly have to be smaller every year, and\or that government is in control of all companies by getting tax in shares (and you know how competent they are about doing anything whatsoever).

you mean fake tesla subredit

I think some care needs to be taken here with respect to what "fair" means.

There doesn't need.

Retail investors have trivial way to express disatisfaction with any decision being made in a company. Sell (in this case at a profit), and buy something else where you actually agree with the decisionmaking.

Cognitive dissonance. Good.

When things don't go the way you think they "should", use the opportunity for re-evaluating your priors.

Coz that disaster clown made them a 10B on every B invested. If you were into non-disaster clowns in like Ford or VW, they made you nothing or a loss.

Controlling stock in the hands of someone who 10x'd the company is better than in hands of someone who didn't 10x the company.

Also since he won't or can't sell them, it is good for the stock price short term.

Does the estimate assume linear extrapolation?

bout fiddy

fancy

bonk

Can I strip the "fairing"?

I should ask for better financial appreciation of my destructive impulses...

Wait, it will cost a bil to destroy a space station?! Siiiigh.

With how large surface area to transfer it elsewhere? You are forgeting the "source" part of the "heat". Degrees define a temperature, not a heat source.

That would require massive engine redesign, no?

infinity percent improvement

The question then becomes WHY they don't have regenerative cooling loops of liquid oxygen. That I'm not sure.

I would venture to guess no space and no heat source anywhere to create sufficient amounts of gas from cryogens...?