Everyone is saying the mall, but I'd recommend the Netherlands Carillion Park instead, less crowded and you have a beautiful view of the monuments from there.
If a shop is openly selling fentanyl they should face the full wrath of the law.
Yeah I'm sorry to say you just moved to one of the highest crime areas of the city according to DC crime data.
A week and a half is honestly too long for either city. If you can rent a car then you do have fantastic day trip opportunities in both. You could also do a train tour and feasibly do Boston, NYC, Philadelphia, and DC all in one trip…. Also since haven’t decided, have you considered the West Coast? I think it’s a much more interesting place to spend a week and a half. Look into San Francisco, you have tons of history, gorgeous nature, excellent food and great transit, and there’s a ton to see and do in a week and a half.
Buttigieg is also a great speaker and can tear Trump up in a debate. I’d rather save him for 2028 though and not this suicidal election.
People here are going to parrot the Huberman line that it’s bad no matter what, and maybe they’re right. But looking at southern Europe they all drink wine in moderation and they seem to be the happiest healthiest societies. So who knows?
Oh I’m not saying horrible things didn’t happen. But war propaganda, censorship, and a common mission have a way of boosting people’s morale. Especially when you’re in the US and aren’t personally experiencing the horrors of war.
Seconded for Nakazawa. Out of curiosity how does their sushi compare to average sushi in Japan? I’ve eaten there, but have yet to go to Japan.
Funny enough I feel like the 1940s in the US actually was a good vibe. People tend to be happier when there’s a collective mission to stop evil. Different story in Europe of course.
That’s 8 whole types and encompasses a whole lot of people. I guarantee you’ve met S types that you’ve liked and vibed with.
Shoplifting isn’t too interesting from a public safety perspective. I’m more interested in robberies, those are down 33% year on year.
I mean don’t really know how to argue with that claim. Then crime stats mean nothing? I think it’s more plausible that crime went down 17%, than victim reporting went down by 17% because we have at least some data, however flawed, to show one conclusion but not the other.
Why would victim reporting rates change drastically year to year? That effects crime rates everywhere and always.
Interesting that you see it that way. I think political beliefs are a lot more superficial and easy to change. Cultural background underpins the way you think about everything in very deep unconscious ways. People don’t start developing political beliefs until idk like puberty usually? Whereas cultural programming starts right out of the womb.
Avoidants are pretty functional single but will be miserable in relationships. You can’t be with another avoidant, that will just fizzle out. Anxious attachments can be with an avoidant, but you’ll be constantly annoyed by their need for closeness which will lead to lots of fights (anxious avoidant feedback loop). And if you’re with a secure they’ll start to act anxious based on your distance which leads to similar problems as with the anxious attachment.
Germany may have technically invented the hanburger, but the US made it what it’s recognized globally to be today. I’d argue we even did the same thing with pizza, Italy may have invented it, but the US brought it to the world.
Ordinary people won’t, but you’d be surprised at what kind of value an intelligence agency with a multi billion dollar budget can gather out of the most innocuous information.
Winnemucca route looks prettier, you're hugging the Sierras and have some good stopping points on 395. But with route 2 you can stop in Vegas. So choose based on whether you want to see Vegas or nature more.
I don’t see them as unreviewable, the courts can still review presidential actions as to whether they are unconstitutional or not. They can revoke them, like they did with Biden’s student loan cancellation EO, but they can’t prosecute a president for doing something later found unconstitutional. I think sovereign immunity is important to preserve here as constitutional law can be pretty ambiguous and the president should be able to execute his role without threat of prosecution. This could be material for instance during a time of war or emergency when a President could inadvertently break the law when committing to the use of force.
In terms of bribery, accepting a bribe is a crime and an unofficial act which can still be prosecuted. Pardons just be happen to be one of a Presidents broadest and most unchecked powers as they have always been. I don’t think this decision changes that, pardons have never been revocable by a court, and it would require its own Supreme Court case to change that.
Was presidential immunity not already a thing as part of the doctrine of sovereign immunity? I see this decision as clarifying that.
Only because I've never had a romantic interaction with one. I'm not sure if I've met a female INTP.
No it makes it easier because you don’t have to account for a commute when choosing housing.
Does having a WFH job make finding housing harder in this area?
nova