You have a peculiar situation. On one hand, for the sake of volatile patients that may seek your counsel in the future, I am tempted to say that you should be very wary as to whether or not you have the emotional maturity to become a clinical psychologist. But on the other hand, I am sure anyone is capable of great change, and just by your post here, you are already showing this change. The other comments have solid advice. So long as you don't violate the RO and you check with the board, you should be fine. An RO is not necessarily a felony charge, which means you'll have a higher chance of being off the hook.

It is best to ask a professional for a diagnosis. Asking online, especially in a server with only students, is of no benefit to you or anyone else.

Statistics is good especially for research, but a personal regret for me was not doing more biology courses which would have benefitted me both in cognition and in neuroscience. I would do stats or bio if I wanted to go the research route, and philosophy if I was going the clinical route. I personally am a philosophy and psych double major, and the amount of skills I have gained from philosophy has helped me immensely in being able to connect with others, think abstractly, and in my writing and communication skills as well.

I don't know how to answer this "psychologically" speaking, but I think that a lot of times it really comes from the fact that when you're busy 24/7, you stay task-oriented, and you don't stress or get tired in the way that most would normally do. For different people, different amounts of work constitute their level of eustress, so I think when you're seeing someone very busy but happy at the same time, they're merely at their level of eustress.

As for the remark you made about burnout, it is true for most people, but not all. I've personally felt both very happy and the absolute worst when I took 12 hour sessions to study for finals. When I feel shit, it's exactly due to what you've mentioned here. But when I felt most happy, it was when I was actually enjoying the material I was getting into, and when I felt most that this material was going to benefit me in some way career-wise.

You should look elsewhere just in case, but I've seen people get it above 200 before. That said, you shouldn't bank on it, as the amount of people who switch around vary widely from year to year, and considering that it's relatively late for students to accept offers from other universities, there's a very large chance that you're not going to get in.

That does not encapsulate the nuance between all of the personality disorders. Also, answers to those questions tend to demonstrate attitudes, which are very subjective and not necessarily indicative of symptoms of any PD. The only diagnostic criteria you should look at when trying to identify a personality disorder should be the DSM-5-TR and the ICD-11

I don't think that there were previous instances where more slots were opened, but there are a few things to consider here. One is that many students really just apply for all of them and when they get one, they drop the rest. Another thing is there are students who don't seem to understand that most labs require 309, and 309 requires 201 and 202, so those students will be rejected from the lab courses. So just hang tight, if you're far up enough on the waitlist, I'm sure you'll be able to get into one.

you'll get a bachelor's in each respective field, but only one will be an honours bachelor's degree from what I've seen in the degree explorer

HR is a great place to start with a psych degree, especially if you're not looking to do higher education. You might also benefit from looking into marketing as well, since a lot of job fairs at college have people scouting around for marketing positions. If you'd like to alleviate some of the debt that you're gonna have, I personally recommend behavioral health tech jobs (since most provide overtime + when you're on a nursing schedule, you get more time to do a second job), ABA therapy (sometimes they let psych students start early), case management (again, sometimes you can start early with this), and crisis line work.

It's really weird, but as someone who used to crumble pretty easily under pressure, I found that when actual emergency situations arose (by actual I mean situations where stakes are life and death), I did not feel any pressure at all. I think that having worked inpatient drug rehab for a while, you get exposed to a lot of stressful situations every day, which serves as a sort of "exposure therapy" if you will.

My advice would just be to expose yourself more to these situations with others present that can help if things get to be too much for you. Another thing would be to stay task-oriented. Someone's OD-ing on the ground? Your task is to make sure that person isn't gonna die. How do you do that? CPR, grab the Narcan, point to someone to grab the defibrillator, point to another person to call 911, etc. What do you do after the crisis has been averted? You go outside, you throw up from the stress, you come back inside, and you calm the other patients. In other words, you panic AFTER the situation is over. You are allowed to be stressed out at the end of the day when there are no stakes involved. You ARE NOT allowed to be stressed out DURING the situation. That's just how I handled it all.

The link will be here for when you take up the mantle again. Rest easy soldier! https://discord.gg/KzYyZDgb 

Reality is you're in it now, so you'll either do nothing and drown because your performance doesn't match the level that's required to be in your program, or you work as hard as you humanly can (and then more), and get to a level of understanding that is on par with what you're expected to do. That said, don't compare yourself to your peers, it'll just ruin your peace. Compare yourself to yourself. Simple as that.

(Btw I say all this because I've experienced what you're currently describing, and this was how I got out of it)

Hydra will use this newfound information against the Cap

I don't think that you should even start to let those gym stereotypes begin to deter you from health. The last thing you want to do is look back at your life on your deathbed thinking "I could have had so much more time if I didn't give a shit about what random guys thought". It's morbid, I know. But think about how ridiculous that statement is, and you'll start going back.

As for working out outside of the gym, it's totally possible (e.g. calisthenics), but you'll need A LOT more discipline, because you will most likely not have all of the workout equipment and you'll have to make do with what you have at a home gym, and that's usually not too much. What you lose in equipment, you regain in intensity and time expenditure. If you're not willing to accept this, then you will have to go back to the gym.

I think it was moreso he gave that money out of love, and when she said that she couldn't take it, he just made the joke that she paid for his food to make it seem less of a big deal. So by this understanding it really is not about the money itself, it was about the intention behind the money, which was love. That's what makes this a wholesome meme.

Bro it was just a joke. But anyways, I'll respond to your comment. You're thinking too much about the material aspect of this act. I don't think the bf thought about it from a material aspect like the comment entails. It was an act that was done out of love, and he just jokingly made a comparison to alleviate the idea that the gf had some sort of reciprocity norm she needed to "fulfill". That's why I made that joke. Clearly it was an act out of love and not merely an act of egoism with the underlying purpose to get closer with the gf. You can express an opinion, but expression is not a sufficient condition for not missing the point.

Took 320 with Walker, and I remembered there were a lot of terms and models that seemed to state the same thing. That said, if you're really interested in the social psychology of attitudes and/or you thought that 220 was a blast, I'd say 320 will be a great courses, provided you study your ass off.

Depends on what you did in those coding classes and what language you used. But from what I remember, it really was just a shit ton of memorizing basic stats formulas. You can go to the syllabus archive and find the 220 syllabus easily. Just check out the topics from there.

220 was easy work, at least at UTM. Didn't even study for that stuff. I know that the material is the same independent of the prof or campus, so I really think that you'll be fine so long as you have some high school stats under your belt. Also, R is declarative so you'll have no problem understanding the code either.

https://discord.gg/KzYyZDgb here it is! Indicate under roles that you're going to take part in the challenge, and you'll be able to get started!

Study Challenge!Tips & Advice

Hi everyone! I just wanted to give a couple of tips that have helped me improve my study quality in the past year.

Visualization: before I begin, I visualize all of the tasks that I have to do, but I also visualize how I will feel when they are done. It makes the finish line seem closer, and the task at hand less daunting.

Journalling/meditation: I don't like calling it this since it really isn't as rigorous, but there's not a better term for it. Write down how the day's been so far, and what you're about to do. Or close your eyes and focus on the info your senses are giving you. Is it the smell of the tea or coffee that you've made before starting your session? How does your study music (or lack thereof) sound to you? This seems like a waste of time, but it helps get rid of that anxiety for the task in front of you, and you'll find it much easier to start as a result.

Go outside during your breaks. You need a change of scenery and perspective when you're studying to avoid fatigue. Go pet your dog, go feed your fish, go make a 16th coffee (go on, I won't tell), and for the love of the Lord, please do not scroll your phone. That is not a break, as you won't feel refreshed after it.

Lastly, having accountability buddies is always a great thing to do. You ever feel like you perform better at the library or when someone else is around? The social facilitation effect can be defined as the increased performance on a well-learned task in the mere presence of others. In other words, on tasks that don't require an absurd amount of cognitive effort, you may actually perform a lot better when you have others present! That leads me to this challenge. We are trying to create a small study community where we will keep each other accountable and study 10 hours for 5 days a week. I get that this is a lot, but if you even have the slightest amount of interest, please let me know!