Nick wright said we just won't go away on first things first a couple days ago lol
You think Paolo is going to let himself get shut down?
I disagree
Magic in 6
You have insulted me twice and you have also failed twice to convince me of what you claim
You say they would defend Poland, but they did not in real life so your claim is based off fantasy where mine is based off reality and what actually happened.
You can keep insulting me and pretending what I am saying is foolish but it is you in fact who is making themself look lile a fool.
And plus Russia has a history of invading it's neighbors if you are not aware of, and when you take into equation that your population will soon be starving, it makes sense to go ahead and take on some casualties if you have a crystal ball and know that a future conflict will likely take there lives away anyway unless the war is fought and won at a earlier date like OP asked.
If you spent the same amount of time you took to insult me to actually think of and type out a legitimate response then I believe you would also see that what I'm saying makes sense, in some weird twisted way.
Your point however makes zero sense.
Russia would have to fight several smaller nations....
They already did and they won
Russia would have to go through Poland.....
They already did and they won, sure it was a decade after the timeframe OP laid out but certainly that proves that it was not completely out of reach to at least imagine the Soviets were able to industrialize quicker or more efficiently than they easily could have beaten Germany even if it had to fight all of the rest of Europe that would not ally themselves with the Soviets.
Let's not forget about the massive influence the Soviets had in the 1930s
40 million Soviets died in WW2 and they were still ready to die for there motherland only a decade after the timeframe OP asked about so yeah man I don't know if your just a communist hater or what but we can at least be honest when talking about the Soviets
It seems as if you are being disingenuous and I ask you to please give me one intellectual response that gives me at least a slither of a opportunity to change my mind as I am open to being wrong but I just don't see it especially with such a weak counterargument.
Are we sure France would defend Germany in this hypothetical?
They did just fight against each other in WW2
Plus they ended up fighting Germany, Romania, Hungary, Italy, and even some Ukrainian divisions so yeah perhaps it would have been better to invade them before they load up for a operation Barbarossa but the Soviets were behind in terms of industrializeation so it's hard to tell how it would have gone but my point stands.
If you can't feed 8m people you matter as well send them to there likely death if it gets you any closer to the end of a upcoming war that will end up taking 5x as many people that starved plus who knows, they might even find some cattle to eat.
I think it's more likely America would join as well but I'm not sure that all these countries you listed could defeat the Soviet Union, it's possible but I'm not sure.
My only point is if there going to starve they matter as well go fight the enemy
If you got 8 million people about to die to starvation then perhaps starting a war would not be such a bad idea since you can't feed them anyway
The Soviets lost about 40 million in WW2 once they eventually fought Germany
If they invade earlier, I believe it might've ended up better for the Soviets as crazy as it sounds
Joint! Joint! Joint!
Take Ukraine first and then continue to reinforce the front
Why do some people have a hard time understanding that not every person is going to die from the first shot, even if you shot a nuke at a bunch of different people, at least one dude is going to survive
Some people can take bullets better then others, especially if they are in healthy condition and strong
Some people got adrenaline pumping and he won't feel that bullet until he gets close to bleeding out or adrenaline wears off.
Real war is similar to HLL in several ways, one being that just cause you shot at something doesn't mean you hit it
And just because you hit something, doesn't mean you killed it.
Sometimes you get the kill, sometimes you don't
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Go cry some more
Police gave me a ride home in the middle of the night, I called and said I was lost lol
I can vouch for this
Bunch of illegal immigrants used to work where I was working at last year, they all live together, ride together, and they all send money home
Did that for a few years and now they are all doing better then before
They are not homeless and they never will be as long as they use there brain
The only reason he didn't have enough time to react is because he was speeding and trying to pass in the middle of a intersection lol
You act like the motorcycle guy was just driving normal, clearly he is a Lunatic
This is unfortunately also true
Wait til Paolo wins two rings back to back
They gon have to talk about us then
Based off the rationality displayed on this post I believe it's very possible that OP was in one of those situations where the guy is 18 hooking up with a 17 year old and the parents got mad or something like that
Laws are weird and usually SO's are weird but OP seems unusually normal considering the charges.
I guess if he served his time then I'd pass em a joint if he was at the same party as me
Rocks in my path? I shall keep them all
With those I will build my castle
Mo and Paolo look great, Franz and Suggs look good
everyone else should be traded for something that will help these four players win, not grow
Post Game Thread: The Cleveland Cavaliers defeat The Orlando Magic 96-86
OrlandoMagic