Personally still think the d is a mess. 

Would like a 2nd pairing dman and another, more reliable bottom pairing dman.

I would feel better with Zadorov signed or one of the other 2nd pairing dmen (yes, I think Zadorov was a 2nd pairing guy at the end).

The new d guys I wouldn't want in the 2nd pairing, even as fill-ins. Both are okay, but I don't see them as regular bottom pair guys either.

As a Canucks fan, I love everything Edmonton has done so far. The top 9 is insane and depth forwards should no longer be a problem.

Center: mcD, Drais, RNH, Henrique Wingers: Kane, Skinner, Arvidsson, Janmark, Perry...

And obviously they can have some centres be wingers to load up.

I think Edmonton could run it back, and even beat Colorado if they met.

Our 3rd line center was also a huge strength in the playoffs, and while it is good now, it isn't an advantage we will have over other teams.

3rd line center and 2nd pairing are where we got worse, and those are huge contributions for playoffs.

Zadorov is better than the d we signed, so we are worse. I think Zadorov is an elite 3rd pairing dman, but can also play in the 2nd pairing (where he will be in Boston).

The guys we signed are 3rd pairing or 7th dman, especially since they are slower. It's good for "next man up" on the bottom pairing, but i would have liked a #3 dman for flexibility.

I like our top 6 a bit more, and the 4th line is built better. We do miss the big advantage we had last year with Lindholm in the 3rd line center spot (pk and pp, face off dominance).

Currently, we need everyone to improve to do better than last year, which isn't realistic. I think more moves will come, but might not be until the regular season.

Edmonton got much better depth scoring, and their top 9 is definitely better than ours right now (skinner and especially Arvidsson are good options, and they kept Henrique and Janmark). I wouldn't feel good in a rematch against them.

I see it as a celebration of the progress we have made so far in addition to celebrating people in the LGBTQ2+ community. This is why everyone celebrates in the pride parades and not just LGBTQ folk.

I was confident we were going to win the series despite the blown 3-0 lead, especially since I thought we were the better team in game 6 but have up too many freebies.

But when they scored the shorthanded goal and it panned to our bench... I puked a bit in my mouth and thought, "They are gonna steal this series." Then, in OT when the Hawks were on the powerplay and the build up to Sharp's chance, I was already teary-eyed and on the brink of crying because I knew what was about to happen.

That Burrows goal was the most emotional goal I've experienced, and I think the only one that will compete with it is the Cup winning goal (when that happens).

Edit: Disregard my comment, clarification received by comment below.

You might already know this, but the reason for playing the hard ones is because the more you progress with the normal ones, the harder other modes become (notably the adventure mode to get a new hero).

The hardest mode also gets you more coins in the bonus round (at least in my experience, but I think it's true lol).

Cookies n cream. I like them, but I get sick of them halfway through lol

Not as physical, not as tight defensively, and caught giving odd man rushes all game.

McDavid has way too much room, but the powerplay has given up shorthanded goals in 2 straight games.

The biggest concern is the odd-man rushes and overall space Edmonton has though. The Panthers used to suffocate Edmonton's stars, but now they have room to move and it's costing them.

Bobrovsky has been outplayed by Skinner as well, but I'm expecting a bad game from Skinner coming up.

You might want to run slower, as you aren't able to keep that pace up.

Then, when you start running more, you can start extending the length of runs and increase speed.

I'm 0-1 this year.

I only see them when they come to winnipeg, so I'm 0-5 all-time :(

I'm not a fan of bigger worlds as it just seems like so much empty space.

I'd rather medium worlds, maybe some puzzles in them, and a medium amount.

I'd rather be left with wanting more from a world than getting bored of one.

I did it that way from like age 5 to 20, but then stopped.

It might have impacted me, but I can have sex and get hard a bunch.

Then that's okay because you won't use your phone for fun

They just learned about King Arthur and now Binky is convinced this Arthur is a king.

Otter hasn't been great all year; very inconsistent. 

Bobrovsky scares me, but I think he's better than Skinner.

The biggest thing going for Florida is their star forwards aren't old and can actually match up with Edmonton.

Dallas might have beaten Edmonton in the first round or 2, but Vegas did a number on Dallas.

If Florida is physical, they can definitely win. Vancouver did that early on and gave them issues. They were also pretty good at shutting down Edmonton's forwards, but Silovs couldn't stop the far shots and they feasted.

I think Florida should win in 6, especially if Skinner gets exposed 

"On accident" annoys me so much and I hear it more and more. 

I also hate "dainties"

I've only heard that used in a negative connotation 

I'd say a lot lined up for Edmonton to get here, so they gotta take advantage. 

And Edmonton got an easy LA, an injured Vancouver (who barely lost), and now more rest. Florida will likely come out rusty from the lack of playing, but I hope Florida is able to keep shutting down teams.

Also, Skinner isn't that good, you just have to pick your shots.

I'm a Canucks fan, but I am also disgusted.

They barely beat an injured Canucks team and then got lucky to play Dallas instead of Colorado.

Florida has to save us now.

I'm cheering for Florida. I find Edmonton whines too much and were gifted their star players. Florida has also had to play some of the best teams to get here, while Edmonton faced a lousy Kings team, an injured Canucks team, and an old Stars team.

I still think Colorado is the best team in the West and would have handled Edmonton.

I like Ekholm, though.

I think it would be funnier if a team gifted generational talent couldn't win a cup with them. They barely got past a hobbled Canucks team, which shows the luck part of winning a Cup.

They weren't gifted him, they still had to trade for him and they traded a 115 point player and a great dman for him. It was a crazy risk that worked out.