You can use Fruity Stereo Shaper to separate the mid/side signals, then route them to distinct mixer tracks. Load Maximus onto each track for individual processing, and there you have it.

I mean, if both the headphones and the speakers utilize Sonarworks with the same target profile, their frequency responses would align closely, essentially rendering them counterparts.

Even if something like that exists, I don't think it's a good idea to get both since the point of having multiple monitors or headphones is so you can hear how well your mix translates on different systems with different characters. Nevertheless, does using calibration software like Sonarworks count?

Lagu aslinya pake gitar, di sini kedengeran kaya pluck ala deadmau5. Kira" kaya gini. Menurut gw sequencenya rada terlalu kompleks kalo pake arp, kemungkinan gambar manual.

I can't directly assist with your specific mix, I can guide you through troubleshooting it. Begin by listening to music that aligns with your style. Listen carefully, noting the balance of each element, stereo placement, and their interactions. This establishes a reference point for your mix. Next, evaluate your own. Identify areas for improvement, such as a lack of punch in the kick, for instance. Start with broad solutions; researching "kick mixing techniques" will yield some methods to experiment with. Continuously experiment until you find techniques that address your issues, applying the same process to other aspects until your mix achieves the desired quality.

Because the software is tuned specifically to the frequency response of the headphone.

i7-4770 is a decade old. Why would you upgrade to a 4790 instead of a newer one? The difference won't be significant. In the meantime, you can bounce some mixer tracks into audio to lower the CPU usage and use the smart disable feature. 

You have the creative freedom to reinterpret the original in any way you see fit. One suggestion I have is to start by identifying the elements of the original song that you want to preserve or pay homage to. This could be the vocal melody, a signature guitar riff, or a catchy drum fill. By incorporating these familiar elements into your remix, you create a sense of continuity and connection to the original while still putting your own unique spin on it.

that initial leap is always the hardest, but I found that with each subsequent release, it became easier to quiet those doubts and fears. So my advice would be to start small, take that first step, and keep putting your work out there. The more you do it, the more natural it will feel, and the less power those nerves will have over you.

This video by Alice Yalcin Efe is a good starting point.

MusicDJ on Sony Ericsson phone.

You can use the Demucs4 HT algorithm on MVSEP to make it. The result won't be 100% clean, but it is one of the most powerful separation tools available for free.

There's a good chance that there's a remake of the track on YouTube that you can download for free. That way, you can see how the bass is made.

You can also try to use the mudpie technique to make some unique fills. Basically, you run a part of your track through some effects, then play around with the parameters until you find something interesting to use as a fill. I like to use ShaperBox for this purpose.

Personally, I'm just producing music for the enjoyment of it. While the idea of making it big is intriguing, it's not my sole focus. I have a life outside of music, and creating is just one part of it. If success comes my way, that's fantastic, but if not, I'm still content knowing that I'm doing something I love.

Change the time-stretching mode of all the audio to Resample.

ShaperBox 3. The built-in presets alone can give me a lot of inspiration.

Thanks. Sorry for the late response.

Made this remix a while ago. How's the mixing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yD3d--iZy3s

Good thing they're both available on Splice, so you can listen to every sample yourself before deciding which one is more suitable for you.

I didn't even notice that he was promoting his video and thought he was genuinely asking until you pointed it out, lol.

I don't think there's a DAW specifically made for beginners. Try the demos of the popular ones, and pick the one that is most comfortable for you. Based on my experience trying out several DAWs, FL Studio is the most user-friendly.

I call them clients.

What do you mean by "worth it"? Is it in terms of personal fulfillment, potential career opportunities, financial investment, or something else? Understanding your perspective will help tailor a more precise response.

Valid point, but think of it this way: by attracting viewers through other content, you're actually widening your potential audience. Once they're subscribed, they're more likely to check out your other content too, including your music. It's about creating a diverse range of content that appeals to different interests within your target audience. Plus, your other content can showcase your music production skills, giving viewers a taste of what you offer musically. So while they may initially subscribe for the other content, they could end up becoming fans of your music as well. It's all about leveraging different content types to ultimately grow your channel as a whole. But then again, what has worked for me may not work for you, but it won't hurt to try. Feel free to share some other ideas that others might want to try as well.