I know modern semiconductor reticle limit is 26x33mm, but that’s with significant reduction of the actual mask. Were earlier process reticle limits larger? Whats preventing us from having arbitrarily larger reticle limits if we’re willing to sacrifice minimum geometries?
Why not replace it with an interpolated value?
Is it possible to combine this process with a more modern process so you can get high density/resolution locally, but with lower resolution global features and interconnects?
I’m looking to design something integrated, where transistor density is less important than total solution size.
Same! Had no idea why it was important, but clearly remember seeing live video.
What do you mean? Converting CO2 into something that can be stored/sequestered means it’s not going into the atmosphere.
The subsequent article I found, the researchers said >99%
A better article with reference to the Nature publication: https://www.theengineer.co.uk/content/news/new-technique-developed-to-transform-waste-co2-into-high-value-chemicals/
100% efficient in that it theoretically converts 100% of the CO2, not that it is net energy neutral
Assembly languages aren’t super useful in industry as they pigeonhole you into specific architectures that may not be ideal for the product (though ARM assembly would be the most useful). C and Rust are super useful for embedded development and HDL (I.e. VHDL, Verilog) is super useful for FPGA and ASIC design (though High Level Synthesis (HLS) is getting to be very efficient).
No, this is the whole premise of regulations, because free market capitalism isn’t in people’s best interests, and sometimes you need to step in and place guardrail protections.
Before seeing what sub this was, the comments, or getting to the end of the question…I was incredibly confused and wondered how his wasn’t all over the news.
Other than it’s the antithesis of capitalism, why is pricing control the scourge of the earth?
Gelsite is an unnecessarily complicated solution to the problem.
Left half is a matter of perspective. Touch it, then walk around to the other side and touch again. Now you have 100% of it, and just need to figure how to fuse it together.
TikTok is not named in the legislation, and is not motivated by US commercial companies. This is 100% that China is our #1 adversary, and we KNOW they (a foreign state actor not friendly to us) are collecting information on our citizens and are actively sowing dissent and make our young people idiots (for lack of a more elegant way to put it)
EDIT: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/815
DIVISION H-- PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATIONS ACT
In theory, they are working to stop it by constantly shutting down millions of fake accounts. It’s an uphill battle, and they’re not particularly successful, but we’re talking apples and oranges here.
The US is focused on selling to a US entity to stop the disinformation and propaganda. If China refuses to divest, then the alternative is to ban it.
So much focus on TikTok’s user data collection and user tracking as if every other company doesn’t do the same. For 99% of US citizens, who cares if the Chinese government has that data vs any other entity. People should be up in arms over all collection and tracking, not just China. For the other 1%, they already know, and have removed the app.
So much focus on TikTok’s user data collection and user tracking as if every other company doesn’t do the same. For 99% of citizens, who cares if the Chinese government has that data vs any other entity. People should be up in arms over all collection and tracking, not just China. For the other 1%, they already know, and have removed the app.
So much focus on TikTok’s user data collection and user tracking as if every other company doesn’t do the same. For 99% of US citizens, who cares if the Chinese government has that data vs any other entity. People should be up in arms over all collection and tracking, not just China. For the other 1%, they already know, and have removed the app.
General Atomics ASI has an air to air and air to ground system based on a 12” gimbal - LAC12
Airborne semi-COTs optical coms system providers?
lasercom