Send their coke dealers to their addresses when they can't pay. 👀 I see you at the club MF.
Yes, it matters but it all depends on what kind of training. I'm not sure what exercise you're trying to do but gyms have many standard machines that can isolate certain parts of the body and there are free weights that can do the same.
The general rule is to isolate the muscle you are working on and use proper form. If you are trying to achieve larger muscle mass, and an increase in ability to lift a certain amount of weight, then you need to do controlled reps of increasing weights over time, but just keep the form and you will not have to do so many reps your work it out can actually become shorter as you learn how to lift to failure.
Never do benchpress without a spotter. There are plenty of machines to work out that muscle group, but ultimately free weights will provide the best returns over time. If you workout by yourself then there are plenty of ways to make progress without using free weight, bench press, for example.  you can do bench flies and do your max lifting with a machine where are you can sit in the upright position as well 
Everybody has their own process, but you can do less sets and fewer reps and gain muscle mass at and strength at a high rate. If you follow some basic rules like 8 to 12 reps with the heaviest weight, you can at least do eight reps and no more than 12 that goes for upper body for the most part and lower body is 15 to 20.
Short answer is if you want to lift more weight, you have to try to lift more weight, but there are 1 million different training regimen for different athletes and different desired outcomes as the male and female body differ, so do the necessities of the athlete or individual strength training is not something certain athletes will do as much as endurance training or skinny strength versus bulk strength, etc. 
Correct I am responding to agree with a comment. Larry Cheng is like fucking Confucius. It is quite possible that he is presenting a counter argument to that person's thesis or showing how that person is a bad faith "journalist". Some of his latest posts have been the most blatant about the company, GameStop. The dude is so cryptic I think that he astrally projects himself from the sphinx.
The article says radio shack and sears are good investments(?)... so.... that tracks?
Came here to say this.
Christ, I'm getting a stomach ache from laughing at this chorus of psycho characters that don't understand the technical architecture of linguistic mechanics.
Strong meme. Puts hair on your face. Upvote
Book it baby
You're right, and every time the price is volatile, the shills and negative articles come out of the woodwork; and, of course, the options talk starts going crazy. Not a coincidence.
RK is pleased by your effort. I bestow upvote in his respect.
Can't stop won't stop
GameStop
Book it baby
One of the biggest pieces of shit I remember from the hearings 
I thought he was done Thursday night, I'm convinced he's not posting for a while after Friday. That being said, nothing would surprise me, But it really looked like a farewell for now type of Thursday night post and same flavor all Friday.
Not selling
Shorts never closed
Reddit will get fucked with more and more the bigger the danger to the short hedge funds 
☝️👀👍
Bingo
🏅💰🏅💰🏅💰
Any one else think it’s odd we are just now getting swap data (and more) released to us? I do and I’m not buying “their game plan” $GME 🦍🍦⭐️
Superstonk