Friend, wearing the uniform of the opposing faction for a civil war is actually proof enough. Comparing open confederates to Trump is nonsensical.

Like yes Bethesda's games are huge and more casual friendly but BG3 getting as high and popular as it did is wild all things considered.

I'm going to disagree for the most part. It's a solidly constructed game with a solid first act, but the thing that got it as popular as it did was brand name recognition (DND is a huge franchise) and a TON of advertising.

Well, you certainly covered two extreme positions. Maybe there's something other than an extremist approach we could try.

And of course the article does cover the rest of the world, but this is a site that's very popular with US audiences (and the non-US people are infatuated with the US too), pretty appropriate focus really.

But what is that bowl that supposedly turned the cans into chips?

It's pretty much a blender, you can see the blades in it.

where they clip some wires

My guy, that's just holding the lid on while the blender runs.

Again, if generals were so valuable you wouldn’t have to force people to take them.

Friend, that is a foolish argument on so many levels.

People historically sought education because the information was valuable, because the knowledge and skills being offered had a tangible benefit worth investing in.

I get that's your firm belief, but it's wrong and unfounded.

And let’s be real, you’re not paying for knowledge.

I certainly am. I have a degree, and I'm pursuing my second one. One of the big things I'm paying for is access to experts who I can ask questions and who can clarify my misunderstandings and provide me further related areas to pursue. The value you don't get from a youtube video or a google search. I of course also get a community of peers to learn with, which is again something youtube doesn't get you. You might also recognize that the process of being evaluated is a big part of what actually forces people to learn. Google degrees are not the same.

You’re paying for a degree.

Hey, I would agree, I'm paying for credentials. And one of those things included in those credentials is them certifying that a graduate has a broad range of knowledge, such that the phrase "I have a degree" actually means something in a broad sense. Which we could contrast with "I have 17 CS certificates".

Again, if you'd like to instead argue that people working as engineers shouldn't need a degree you'd have a much better argument. It would still be a pretty poor one, but you'd be off to a better start.

As it stands your inability to understand the value of general education is your own problem. ChatGPT has it figured out, and I'd start with trying to have a more complex and nuanced understanding of the topic than ChatGPT does before writing your book.

I don't think a single Dem would say that. That would be announcing their party is either corrupt or incompetent.

And I completely agree otherwise. Expressing any doubt about Biden on this site for me has only ever resulted in a chorus of "What so you want Trump back" or "Well, who would YOU want to be president then smart guy". It's honestly embarrassing how uncritically people defend Biden as a ritual against Trump returning.

If the title is any indication the trial is timed for political impact. They're waiting on time to pass so that Trump will be on trial during the Republican primary elections.

The right to a speedy trial isn't just for the accused, but for everyone else asl well. If that's how long is takes then we need dramatic reform.

And of course it's obvious that's not how long it has to take, it's how long people in power have chosen to take. There was clear evidence of political felonies during Trumps 2016 campaign, where are the charges on that?

self-evident

There is no such thing. And if we adopt that line of thinking you can bet your ass the next Democrat that would be elected is going to be found guilty of crimes that bar them from office, and when asked to justify it they'll claim it's "self evident" and they don't need to prove anything.

The Atlantic article is fucked. It's like the "technically true" of constitutional interpretation.

I did say that about Biden, and still do. Biden is for sure the lesser evil, but we deserve better than the lesser evil.

People aren't taking it as far as MAGA, but they've certainly latched onto him and won't accept any idea like "Biden might not actually be the best person for the job, but is instead the person who benefits the DNC the most".

Again, it's not MAGA, but it is pure partisan politics.

Your standards are incredibly silly for a reddit post, and especially one where the premise I outlined is the default of the sub. It's literally what the sub is about. People don't need to be a gender philosopher to post here, nor a linguist.

That's a fair argument to make, and is something I like to argue as well as a linguistics student when talking to people about language.

Great, then maybe you can argue with yourself and rebuke the rest of the nonsense you included. It's a great time to find a more useful framework, yours aint cutting it. I'd start with one that rebukes unnecessary gendering of things, rather than portraying them as a "rule".

Have fun disagreeing with a rule of English that has been the case since the 18th century.

Yeah, that's how us users of language do things. Have fun making the argument that nothing has changed in the way we use language since the 18th century, not should anything change.

Thankfully I don't have to argue that, since Simone DeBuvior pointed it out 80 years ago that aspect of language has changed a lot. Nor should OP have to argue that silly shit either.

pure grammar

There is no such thing, time to break out of the 18th century friend.

but "him" is grammatically gender neutral

Yeah, I'm going to disagree on that one. I'd also point out that the foundation of modern feminism was the insight that placing on gender as the "default" is a key feature of the oppression of women that feminism arose from.

Yeah, it's pretty god awful when you try and imagine it as a job training factory that you can only access with a lifetime of debt. It's pretty fucked up.

The whole system works a lot better when it's focused on education, and when education is viewed as a social good to be provided as broadly and cheaply as possible. The sort of thing we were really into before we started buying into the myth of the university as a job training factory.

Why aren't universities job training programs?

ChatGPT

While universities do offer programs that prepare students for specific careers, their primary role goes beyond just providing job training. Here are some reasons why universities are not solely job training programs:

Broad Education: Universities aim to provide a well-rounded education that goes beyond narrow vocational training. This broader education equips students with critical thinking, problem-solving, communication, and analytical skills that are valuable across various professions and in navigating complex life situations.

Changing Job Landscape: The job market is constantly evolving due to technological advancements and shifts in the global economy. While job-specific skills are important, an education that emphasizes adaptability, creativity, and a strong foundation in diverse subjects can better prepare students to navigate changing career landscapes.

Life Skills: University education focuses on developing life skills that extend beyond the workplace. These skills include ethical reasoning, cultural awareness, interpersonal communication, time management, and the ability to think critically about societal issues. These qualities contribute to personal growth and success in various aspects of life.

Intellectual Exploration: Universities encourage intellectual curiosity, exploration, and the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake. This approach allows students to engage with a wide range of subjects and develop a deeper understanding of the world, fostering a love for learning that extends beyond immediate career goals.

Interdisciplinary Learning: Many of today's challenges require interdisciplinary solutions. Universities provide an environment where students can explore connections between different fields of study, leading to innovative approaches that might not arise from strictly job-focused training.

Civic Engagement: Universities promote civic engagement and responsible citizenship. Students are encouraged to think critically about social, political, and ethical issues, empowering them to contribute to their communities and society at large.

Long-Term Success: A university education equips students not only with technical skills but also with the ability to adapt, learn, and grow over their entire careers. This long-term perspective on personal and professional development goes beyond immediate job placement.

Research and Innovation: Universities are centers of research and innovation that contribute to the advancement of knowledge and the development of new technologies. These activities enrich society and industry beyond immediate job training.

Diverse Career Paths: Many students change careers multiple times throughout their lives. A university education provides a foundation that can be applied to various career paths, offering flexibility and opportunities for growth in different fields.

Global Perspective: Universities expose students to diverse cultures, ideas, and perspectives, fostering a global outlook that is essential in today's interconnected world.

While universities do offer career-specific programs and work to align their curriculum with industry needs, their broader purpose is to provide a comprehensive education that prepares students not only for their first job but for a lifetime of personal, intellectual, and professional growth.

Yeah, those are good questions. They are in fact so basic chatGPT can handle it. Which really highlights the value of an actual education instead of a STEM training program.

What is the purpose of University?

ChatGPT

The purpose of a university is multifaceted and encompasses a variety of educational, research, and societal goals. Here are some of the key purposes of a university:

Education: Universities are primarily institutions of higher education where students pursue academic degrees, such as bachelor's, master's, and doctoral degrees. They offer a wide range of academic programs and courses to provide students with specialized knowledge, skills, and critical thinking abilities in various disciplines.

Research: Universities serve as hubs of research and innovation. They conduct groundbreaking research across various fields, contributing to the advancement of knowledge, technology, and human understanding. Research conducted at universities can have practical applications that benefit society and the economy.

Knowledge Dissemination: Universities play a crucial role in disseminating knowledge to the broader community. Faculty members publish research papers, books, and articles, sharing their findings and insights with fellow academics and the public. This knowledge dissemination helps inform public discourse and decision-making.

Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving: University education fosters critical thinking skills, analytical abilities, and problem-solving capabilities. Students are encouraged to question, evaluate, and synthesize information, enabling them to approach complex issues with a thoughtful and informed perspective.

Cultural and Intellectual Growth: Universities provide an environment for cultural enrichment and intellectual growth. They expose students to diverse perspectives, ideas, and experiences that broaden their horizons and encourage lifelong learning.

Professional Development: Many careers require specialized knowledge and skills that can be obtained through higher education. Universities prepare students for professional careers by offering practical training, internships, and opportunities to apply theoretical knowledge in real-world settings.

Community Engagement: Universities often serve as centers of community engagement. They organize events, workshops, and outreach programs that benefit local communities and address societal challenges. Universities can act as sources of expertise and resources for addressing community needs.

Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Universities contribute to economic development by fostering innovation and entrepreneurship. They provide resources, mentorship, and support to students, faculty, and alumni who want to turn their ideas into startups or innovative solutions.

Cultural Preservation: Universities may also have a role in preserving cultural heritage, traditions, and languages. Through cultural studies programs and research, they contribute to the understanding and preservation of diverse cultures.

Global Collaboration: Universities serve as international hubs for collaboration and cultural exchange. Students and faculty from different countries come together to learn, conduct research, and share ideas, contributing to global cooperation and understanding.

In essence, universities are institutions that facilitate personal growth, societal progress, and the advancement of human knowledge through education, research, and community engagement.

Why do universities include general education requirements?

ChatGPT

Universities include general education requirements to ensure that students receive a well-rounded and comprehensive education that goes beyond their chosen major or field of study. These requirements aim to provide students with a broad foundation of knowledge, skills, and perspectives that are essential for their personal and intellectual development, as well as their ability to engage effectively in a diverse and complex world. Here are some reasons why universities include general education requirements:

Breadth of Knowledge: General education requirements expose students to subjects outside their major, helping them acquire a basic understanding of various disciplines such as humanities, social sciences, natural sciences, and arts. This breadth of knowledge contributes to a holistic education that fosters critical thinking and interdisciplinary connections.

Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving: General education courses often emphasize critical thinking skills, analytical reasoning, and problem-solving abilities. Exposure to different ways of thinking and approaching problems can help students develop these skills, which are valuable across various disciplines and in real-world scenarios.

Cultural Awareness and Diversity: General education requirements often include courses that explore different cultures, histories, and perspectives. This helps students develop cultural awareness, sensitivity, and a better understanding of global issues, fostering a sense of empathy and tolerance.

Effective Communication: Many general education courses focus on written and oral communication skills. Clear communication is essential for success in any field, and these courses help students become more effective communicators in both personal and professional contexts.

Adaptability: In a rapidly changing world, adaptability is crucial. General education requirements expose students to a wide range of topics and ways of thinking, preparing them to navigate new challenges and opportunities regardless of their chosen career paths.

Engaged Citizenship: General education often includes courses that encourage students to think critically about societal issues, ethics, and civic responsibilities. This helps students become informed and engaged citizens who can contribute meaningfully to their communities and society at large.

Interdisciplinary Connections: Many of the world's most pressing problems require interdisciplinary approaches. General education courses encourage students to make connections between different fields of study, fostering innovation and creative problem-solving.

Well-Rounded Development: A university education aims to develop not only specific skills but also a well-rounded individual. General education requirements contribute to students' personal growth, intellectual curiosity, and lifelong learning.

Exploration and Discovery: For many students, entering university is a time of exploration and self-discovery. General education requirements expose students to a variety of subjects, helping them discover new interests and passions that they may not have initially considered.

Accreditation and Quality Assurance: Including general education requirements can be a component of maintaining accreditation and ensuring that students receive a high-quality education that meets certain standards.

Overall, general education requirements enhance the educational experience by providing students with a broader perspective, a diverse skill set, and the ability to approach complex issues from multiple angles. These requirements prepare students for success in their chosen careers and in life beyond the university setting.

Maybe you can actually think about those questions instead of just mindlessly ranting.

It costs a LOT of money is still just as shallow of an argument.

It damn well better be job training

It ain't, and it never was. Sorry you were misled.

Dont you literally have to swear with your hand upon the bible to become officially president?

Edit: this was is apparently false forget I said anything lmfao

In fact it strengthens your point. While it is no longer required, ALL presidents CHOOSE to declare fealty to their god before accepting power, as do the overwhelming majority of congress and the senate.

De Facto backed by the United States

That's certainly the party line, but the reality looks a lot shakier. If we can assume that vivek ramaswamy is saying the quiet part out loud, then as soon as the US achieve semiconductor independence we'll leave Taiwan to the wolves.

I could write a book on all the reasons generals shouldn’t be required.

Please don't. Your rant is pretty bad to be honest.

If I suggested requiring all janitors to take biology, chemistry, writing, and art before they could legally clean floors, you’d think I was crazy. Why do we require that of engineers? Generals should not be required.

This really highlights where you missed the point. A university is not a job training program, no matter how much we want it to be.

If you'd like to argue that we should only require technical competence out of engineers and we should treat engineering degree like trade schools you'd have a much better argument going. Though you'd still do pretty poorly, as it's extremely clear you don't understand the value of that doesn't provide immediate monetary or direct benefits.

Once you actually figure out the value of general eds and a "well balanced education" you'll be in a better position to argue why engineers don't need them. Hopefully by that time you'll be able to make arguments more complex than "it costs money and people dun like it".

and considerate

Here, just like in MMOs, it is in fact inconsiderate to spam a macro every time you use a cooldown.

You can travel to the desert and burn something big with a few of your closest friends if you'd like. That has always been an option.

The US had already fought their war for independence and ratified their own constitution (the one with things like free speech and guaranteed fair trials) before the French Revolution even began

You might be interested in that "beginning of the revolution" part, it's pretty important.

Please don’t ask an LLM a question you don’t already know the answer to.

Of course that resolves to "don't ask LLM questions".

I've honestly found ChatGPT to do a pretty good job of answering questions, as long as you're looking for a wikipedia level of knowledge - at best. If you want to know what a taxonomist does then it's a great place to ask.