The Great Dust Bowl of the 1930s
Blinded by a misguided faith in "science" combined with belief in "Manifest Destiny," humans destroyed large swathes of natural prairies and rangelands, replacing them with tilled, fertilized, and sprayed fields.
"The chemists war," as WW1 was known, had major advancements in chemistry, such as the Haber-Bosch process of producing ammonium nitrate "from thin air." Though this process helped the Germans produce record amounts of explosives for the war - Haber was awarded the Nobel Prize for his discovery in 1920 due to ammonium nitrate's potential for use in farming.
Additionally, chemists had concocted all manner of poisons and chemicals - and industry had built factories to create these chemicals. After the war ended, rather than close these poison factories - they instead marketed their creations to farmers, who began engaging in "warfare against nature" and growing food using chemical sterilization of the land followed by artificial fertilization.
Crops began to fail with the onset of drought in 1931, exposing the bare, over-plowed farmland. Without deep-rooted prairie grasses to hold the soil in place, it began to blow away. Eroding soil led to massive dust storms and economic devastation—especially in the Southern Plains.
Today, it is estimated that 75% of Earth's Land Areas Are Degraded through rapid expansion and unsustainable management of croplands and grazing lands - not to mention mining, logging, development, etc.
Modern practices do not learn from past mistakes
So, why didn’t we return to natural farming after this tragic lesson? Because large marketing and “Public Relations” empires had sprung up around these chemical corporations. Slowly, these groups rewrote history and embarked on a global campaign to “industrialize farming” in order to solve the crisis of global food shortages which had, in fact, been triggered by trade wars and banking manipulation.
Ever since then, farming business models around the world have been addicted to these toxic poisons and chemical fertilizers. All the while destroying the natural ecosystems which had supported plant growth since the dawn of life on earth.
Any who dare to oppose or counter this chemical monopoly are discredited or silenced. After nearly a century of this narrative control, most people, and even most farmers, genuinely misunderstand the natural abundance of the Earth when living ecosystems are respected and protected.
Permaculture represents a return to Earth-centered farming methods. However, I feel many in this group still view farming with the same mentality that helped turn the "Fertile Crescent" (and birthplace of modern agriculture) into the Arabian desert.
I have been studying permaculture and regenerative agriculture for more than a decade, and I have gained a lot of knowledge and experience around the world - working shoulder-to-shoulder with experts, locals, and activists.
Let's engage in respectful discussion (and even debate) about the concepts mentioned here - and hopefully we can all learn from each other and grow.
- What do you think is the primary cause of global land degradation?
- How do you feel we can and should address this issue?
- Do chemicals have a place in permaculture?
In the end, we only have 1 planet - and our natural resources are dwindling. I personally believe we can (and are) turning things around, but I would love to see what others in this community think a feel on this topic.
There are no wrong perspectives or opinions - but please be respectful of others and understand that we might disagree, but that doesn't make us enemies.
This is a thought-provoking post that has given me pause.
It reminds me of this quote by Jung:
Unpopular Opinion. Most "Jungians" in Reddit pretend to be knowledgeable when they're not
Jung