Itās not inconsistent at all. The PIC has no way of knowing what his intentions were. It sounds like he just assumed. Meanwhile this pilot had no history of suicidal ideation whatsoever, and no prior suicide attempts. This is not adding up to a suicide and is not consistent with suicidal behavior. Ratherā¦
āthe PIC stated that, before departing the airplane, the SIC became visibly upset and apologetic, and reported feeling sick. His actions to increase ventilation in the cabin, which included opening the window and lowering the ramp, as well as his hurried departure from his seat, are consistent with an attempt to address increasing nausea symptoms and a desire to not throw up in the cockpit. However, the SIC made an unsafe decision to run to the rear of the cabin with the ramp in a fully lowered position, as he likely had not previously been in the cabin in flight with the ramp down. It is possible in his haste he lost his footing when encountering the area of the ramp and inadvertently fell from the airplane. Weather sounding and radar data supported the potential for windshear and turbulence activity, and the PIC reported that there had been moderate turbulence during the flight.ā
I dealt with a cross country ferrying scenario too for my plane. Join the Facebook pilot groups of either Florida or Virginia, and find someone to ferry it that way. Young CFIs and commercial pilots are eager to step up. Verify their ratings. Verify your insurance will cover this flight and the pilot. Thereās really not much more to it than that, other than expenses and fees of course. It is a bit harder to find pilots who have 182 experience. But as you know, 182s arenāt hugely complicated to fly. If someone has the correct HP endorsement, has done recent HP flying with a constant speed prop, and is at least familiar with 172s, Iād feel comfortable.
And yeah, since youāre using 30 flaps, youāre going to consistently have too much energy and overshoot, because 30 flaps has you coming in at a flatter descent angle. The point of the 40 flaps recommendation in the POH is to provide a steeper descent angle.
If the POH says 40 flaps, why is your CFI having you using 30 flaps? Iāve repeatedly run into this problem with CFIs also. Theyāre not reading the damn ACS. Hereās what the ACS says youāll be graded on for short field landings:
PA.IV.F.S11 Use manufacturerās recommended procedures for airplane configuration and braking.
I read the report. We will never know for sure but to me it seems likely he accidentally slipped, after having an emotional panic attack due to the hard landing. I am so sorry for the familyāit sounds like he was a great guy.
Not a big fan of the whole ālet a jury calmly decide innocence or guilt before we smoke American citizensā thing eh?
Reasons I do not want to be near fireworks in a Cessna at night: (1) degrading my night vision, and (2) risk of sparking a fire. Donāt forget about the 300 or so pounds of gas youāre flying around.
My dream for my plane one day is to strip the paint completely and polish the chrome.
Prosecutor here. To prosecute laser perps you need a solid law enforcement infrastructure. In many though not all US states that includes a joint task force with coordinated participation from the FAA, FBI, and local/state police. Itās usually local police who provide the choppers that are regularly in use, which can be quickly and easily deployed when the FAA reports a laser sighting. The perp will then laser strike the chopper and boom, youāve got charges of assault on a law enforcement officer. Mexico is basically fighting to stay alive right now. Whatever capacity it has, its resources are insufficient to do the above in a city like Juarez. Mexico City might be a different story.
Well, I said ālikeā 3 seconds. I just watched a random GoPro clip of one of my takeoffs and the literal timing was 5 seconds from throttle to being in the air, on a hot Phoenix morning, from a paved and flat runway. So 3 seconds is probably accurate in cool temps. I use 20 flaps and a short field takeoff as SOP. I use ground effect to hit 70 mph and then hit 10 flaps. My model year of Skylanes are famously light, narrow bodied, and rocket into the air in seconds.
7500ā with wet grass and a tailwindā¦ yikes. If I ever am doing a takeoff in those conditions, I hope Iāve bought a STOL kit and bush tires by then.
Yup, the 75/50 rule is useless for my vintage 182. Iām in ground effect off the ground around 55 mph which is like 3 seconds after I hit the throttle. If Iām on the ground and still not in the air by the 50% runway location, Iāll know that something is afoot.
Yup, it happens. I meant no judgment with my question. I really was just curious and Iām guessing the answer is that he didnāt adjust.
With my āflying CFIsā who tried to teach me ground, I experienced the same. Great human beings, I owe all of āem beers for teaching me how to fly airplanes, but they were not stellar in the classroom. So stop spending money on them for ground stuff, and do spend money on a good ground instructor. How to find one: No tricks I know of for this one. Just use your judgment and intuition.
What happened there, a hard landing? Their 3 hour maneuvers session seems like lunacy to me, especially on a day when it was 113Ā° F. But what do I know.
Iām a white collar guy with a graduate degree but just hear me out for a second. Despite my education I was never a highly disciplined student. The topics that I really loved, I did well in. Everything else, I suffered from poor grades. I adjusted my strategy to account for that, which is how I made it. When it came to the ground school material for PPL, I have suffered. I failed a stage check. And I also failed a checkride on the oral, before later passing. So we arenāt necessarily that different in terms of the struggle.
How did I eventually get over the hump? They key for me was finding a pretty good ground instructor. No offense to the young bucks out there who are CFIs, all of whom that Iāve flown with have been superb FLIGHT instructors by the way. But teaching is a craft just like welding is. You know welding. Teachers know teaching. And the FAAās coursework for becoming a CFI is pretty shoddy on the āhow to be a good teacherā part. If a CFI is not a natural born teacher by nature, and/or doesnāt have a background in teaching classroom methods, they will not be able to unconfuse you much while youāre trying to get this material.
My point: Consider looking for a separate ground instructor solely for ground. I had a very good one who charged much less per hour than CFIs do for flight time. And doing sessions with him was easy because we used Zoom. Itās a cost, yes, but the cost is higher if youāre spending ground time with a bad teacher, and/or you do a ton of work to get to a checkride and then fail the checkride.
I was a student at Sierra Charlie. They have excellent instructors including the one who got me mostly to solo. One day I show up and he was gone, fired, and replaced by a new instructor just like that. We texted later on and being gracious I didnāt want to ask specifically why they fired him, but now I wonder if it was something as stupid as what they did to your son. I want to emphasize here that this instructor they fired was one of the best pilots Iāve flown with despite his young age, and had meticulously safe habits.
No advice here, just a question: You didnāt mention your airspeed. Did you increase it on final given the gust factor?
Not a big deal really. I prefer waking up at 4am like all normal Phoenicians in July, not just to fly but to hike, jog, etc. If I absolutely have to fly mid day, yeah I get sweaty but with my open Cessna door while taxiing the prop is really not so bad. Soon it will be October!
Itās the ADA, not the AMA. Since you hate the law and think itās bullshit, at least pay attention to what itās called. Anyway, the ADA doesnāt require any airline to subject other passengers or your plane to this hygenically unsafe situation, so trashing the rights of all disabled people through this one story is completely uncalled for. You also point out that CS wanted YOU to āpull the trigger,ā but I guess you really meant the chief pilot and/or you in conjunction. Either way, why canāt you and/or the chief pilot just make the proper executive decision and no-go this passenger, again, for hygiene reasons alone? Heās the chief pilot. Not CS. They apparently made that clear to you two. You still waffled on what to do. And then, after refusing to make a proper executive decision, you write up a post in which you fat shame this dying manās family. Just who in the hell do you think you are?
This is a weird ass post. I canāt decide what stinks more: the visuals of that customer or your personality and lack of decisiveness as a captain.
Iām sure your job is frustrating but this doesnāt detract from the point: for some reason most chief prosecutors are politiciansāIāve never understood why that is a good ideaāand anyway itās politicians elected by voters who pass these laws. I think āthe war on drugsā is overblown too. But I didnāt close my eyes and vote for Nixon-Reagan.
Iām a prosecutor. Yeah, some prosecutors err. But you do realize that prosecutors are only able to enforce laws that are passed by legislators, right? And who votes for these legislators, usually giving very little thought to their various policy positions on the issues? We the people.
I donāt see whatās wrong with discussing it.
I bought a C182 and believe I will fly it for the rest of my life. I live in mountainous terrain so the option of landing safely (survivably, at least) on a random patch of dirt 200 feet long is attractive to me. Iām a low hours pilot so the 50 knots stall speed is nice. Having 2 exit doors is also nice for my loved ones. Iāll install airbag equipped seatbelts soon. I could install a parachute if I really wanted to and was flying nighttime IFR a lotāor I could just limit myself to safer conditions. Iāll decide after getting my instrument rating. Needless to say, my main mission is safety which may not be your priority. Iād maybe feel differently if I was former Air Force with 20,000 hours behind me.
Your post is pretty similar to my busted PPL checkride experience, with one minor distinction: The disorganized moron who owned the plane that I intended to fly and did not have adequate logs for the checkride, was me. š Here are details of what happened to me in the hopes of helping you and anyone reading this.
I showed up to my checkride not realizingāalthough I did checklist this and think otherwiseāthat my two-year transponder inspection had expired about 5 days previous. As a new plane owner I had read the annual log entry (I personally attended and watched the annual) and believed that the transponder had been inspected that day. It had not been. This taught me a very valuable lesson about how thoroughly one must understand an aircraftās maintenance logs if youāre going to (a) own it, or (b) use it for a checkride. Iāve since passed the PPL oral after beating myself up for my sloppy approach and lack of complete understanding of these airworthiness requirements. My second attempt was a breeze and the DPE complimented my organization.
I am not calling you sloppy and, in fact, youāre definitely more innocent than I am because you werenāt the owner/operator. But, you still had the same shitty outcome I did, so I donāt know how much consolation that is. Is your flight school sketchy? It absolutely is. But itās still you who got hosed. So lesson #1 I would offer is that a flight school might make this easy on you or it might set you up for failure, and it unfortunately is on YOU to determine which, on a timely basis. A cardinal rule of aviation that Iāve learned the hard way is: Trust no one and trust nothing. Given your massive financial investment in getting to an IFR checkride, I would literally be an asshole to my flight school in demanding full and complete access to the checkride aircraftās full maintenance logs ONE WEEK PRIOR to the checkride. Not one day prior. A full week, at least. If they hem and haw, Iām going to get in their faces. Itās your money at stake. A lot of it. And they happily received it from you.
Lesson #2 would be to use the week-prior access to do a complete audit of the logs and duplicate exactly what the DPE will do to confirm airworthiness. The one week time frame is critical because your audit may reveal a discrepancy or missing log item. You now have barely 7 days to either correct the discrepancy, or select another plane. But if you select another plane, youāll need to again audit the maintenance logsāand now you might only have 6 days left instead of 7.
Iām sorry this happened to you my friend, just as it did to me. I will say that this letdown did not go in vain because I now understand things about the FARs, my plane, my logs, and my responsibilities as a pilot that I did not appreciate on that first attempt. Youāll get em next time so good luck.
Is my flight school sketchy?
GeneralAviation