I’m just wondering, given the fact that solicitors have a full right of audience and can now be appointed Senior Counsel, what functions do barristers perform?
I know barristers can often have specialised expertise in a particular area(s) and are obviously more adept at advocacy (especially in the superior courts). But are these the only distinguishing factors, or are there others?
This is by no means a jab in any way, I’m genuinely just curious.
Barristers are trained more thoroughly in advocacy, the rules of the various courts, court procedure and paperwork. Solicitors have a right of audience but they’re better suited to general advisory matters and dealing directly with clients.
Not a great analogy but most doctors can technically perform surgical procedures with their qualifications, but you tend to hire a fully specialized surgeon to do an operation because that’s what they’re better at.