Reddit removed post for content policy violations
I'm downvoting you for censoring the word "sex".
What does that word mean?
S word? Medieval weapon.
Sword isn't a word, you're thinking of sweared.
PepeLaugh it's so easy to get clipped when you do thought exercises with this topic
I've been playing trackmania listening to xqc and destiny argue this for two hours.
Holy fuck, it's pure content. This should have been the presidential debate.
It's like watching monkeys fling shit at each other, perfect brainrot background noise to edit a video to
LSF clip brains fall for everything.
What normal person thinks this necessitates a “thought exercise”? BE NORMAL
No one cares about the distinctions between pedophiles and ephebophiles. Literally WHO CARES unless you’re one of those?
User deleted comment
9d
That wasn’t the conversation lol, it was about power dynamics and how they can exist in plenty of situations where there aren’t age differences and how age differences simultaneously don’t always lend themselves to power imbalances.
Moderator removed comment
9d
Moderator removed comment
9d
Just a tip, bud. People that don’t care about downvotes don’t come back and comment about how they they love downvotes multiple times lol
More
I never said this is normal behavior brother? Why are you telling me to be normal when you're with me posting on lsf.
The Biden vs Trump debate is causing a huge spike in Reddit traffic, that's probably what's delaying Reddit's comment tree processing.
You are allowed to say naughty words like sex on the Internet, we won't tell on you
Comments borked?
Cinema
Zero upvotes huh? Hmmm 😂
He censored sex
Least pedophilic Destiny take
17 and 18🤮 18 and 56😍
Crazy what you DGG guys will defend. The line has to be drawn somewhere and people have decided at 18 you are an adult (and can make whatever decision you want) and 17 you are still a child. Its that simple. If you want to push what is acceptable into 17 then you guys will want to push the line to 16 then push it to 15.
We all know destiny thinks with his dick constantly so I have to wonder what he has done to be so defensive on this.
You can agree that a law has to be in place without thinking it's necessarily immoral to break that law in certain circumstances. Destiny even agreed on this, the debate wasn't about what the aoc law should be
I am not even talking about the law. Even morally the line has to be drawn. If the attitude is "Well its just ONE more year difference so 17 isn't morally wrong" what is to stop you from saying "Well its just one more year so 16 isnt bad either" then 15, 14, etc.
Over 18 your parents no longer have guardianship. You can vote. You are done with school. Etc. Society says you are an adult. Why not just draw the line there and stop trying to push for lower to be morally acceptable? Its fucking weird for people to be trying to make exceptions and it really makes you wonder.
This all started because Destiny is trying to frame what Doc did as not that bad morally if the girl is 17. Doc was 35 years old at the time. So Destiny is using these thought experiments to try and say its a spectrum of morality and Doc may be lower on it because she was possibly only 1 year under the age limit. This is the slope im talking about. If 1 year becomes acceptable then why not 1 more?
Why is he trying to downplay a 35 year old sexting a 17 year old in the first place? Really makes you think.
It's impossible to tell which is why we stick with what the law says. However, that does not make every case where this line is broken immoral. There's a bunch of examples I could list off but you're better off actually watching what Destiny says since he's much better than me at formulating himself.
If we entertain those examples where you think its morally "not that bad" then we get to the point where Destiny is trying to argue that a 35 year old man sexting a possible 17 year old is "not that bad" as well. He's already sliding down that slippery slope.
There is definitely a power dynamic because Doc is a massive streamer, but we don't have all the information to actually know how bad it is which is Destiny's point. If you think that it's bad in every case, then I'd like an explanation to why.
Man I gave you an explanation already. If you make exceptions you end up like Destiny defending a 35 year old sexting a 17 year old. There's no extra information needed. He knew she was a minor and continued being inappropriate.
You still can't explain what makes that inherently bad though.
Btw he never defended that, he just said he needs more info to say HOW bad it was, not that it wasn't bad at all. You can stop repeating this misinfo now.
You ever wonder if the dude’s just training you on how to defend him when he finally gets caught?
Check him pc
always the people you expect from
User deleted comment
9d
What
FBI,CIA,NSA,TSA,NBA,NRA please someone arrest the freaks in this comment section.
People obsessed in calling everybody pedo are the ones we should check the PC
Yikes
He was explaining the importance of knowing why it is wrong for the 30 year old.
ddgers trying to defend their debate lord when they can't have any comments to reply to
There's nothing to defend here, go listen to the discussion instead of a clip. Destiny isn't saying it's okay, he's just asking xqc to explain why it's morally wrong.
This was a hilarious discussion, but you will miss out on it because you just wanna do the "destiny bad" thing.
😭 So you latched on to their comment to defend your debate lord
tbf i made this comment when there was no comments appearing as a joke
This dude prolly has more dirt on him than doc
User deleted comment
9d
Just to get this over with, he agrees that it's illegal and should remain illegal, and is immoral. He was criticizing X's logic for why.
Why is this getting heavily downvoted? Why downvote your own favorite streamer talking lol?
Where are people getting 17 from?
That fake email?
Shocker
Moderator removed comment
9d
0 upvotes? There’s some hoes in this house
Is it really that hard not to defend fucking teenagers... How do you get rolled into the debate against xqc
Because that's not the actual contention - either xQc is being acoustic and is hyperfixating on Destiny not thinking what happened is NECESSARILY the end of the world or is being content-brained and is trying to rile Destiny up over stupid shit.
Is it really that hard not to jump to conclusions based solely on 1 minute clips?
They would be upset if they could read
you do know 18 and 19 year old are teenagers
No. What do you mean? He couldn't have been watching teens getting fucked for all his life growing up, that would be crazy.
eigh-TEEN
nine-TEEN
The real answer is it's a "social contagion". Good question though.
What do you mean by that?
My understanding is that although some minors might be “mature” enough to have a relationship with someone older, we make it illegal because the vast majority will not and the power imbalance makes it doubly unlikely. Therefore we err on the side of caution and just make it illegal always.
in the USA.
" As of April 2021, of the total fifty U.S. states, approximately thirty have an age of consent of 16 (with this being the most common age of consent in the country), a handful set the age of consent at 17, and in about eleven states the age is 18."
30 X 17
The 30 year old may be charged with having sex with a minor. -
A person commits the crime of rape in the second degree if:... (1) Being 16 years old or older, he or she engages in sexual intercourse with a member of the opposite sex less than 16 and more than 12 years old; provided, however, the actor is at least two years older than the member of the opposite sex
nothing would happen to the 17 as he/she is the "victim"
17x17
" however, the actor is at least two years older than the member of the opposite sex "
Nothing - as they are of the same age. go have a great time! wear condom please.
in theory
13x13 13x14 14x14 15x15 15x16 16x16 16x17 17x17 , 17x18 = OK legal but please wear condom
13 X >=15, 14 X >=16 , 15 X >=17, 16 X >=18 , 17 X >=19 = N OK go jail
14 missing replies
CLIP MIRROR: Destiny asks whats the difference between 2 underage people & a 17 year old and a 30 year old having s*x
This is an automated comment