I've been playing another crabs treasure and its main villain is probably the most capitalist villain I've seen.
His plan in the end doesn't involve big obvious crimes like most capitalist villains. He just wants to accelerate and prop up the current system which kills people by merely doing currently sanctioned actions, damn the dissenters. He actually gets offended that you suggest violence as in his eyes he's just a businessman doing businessman stuff and I find most interesting of all you have to in game attack him to initiate the boss fight.
I think this is a pretty interesting statement. Capitalists in even anticapitalist games are often depicted as aggressors, doing crimes to justify attacks against them but here the capitalist simply is, he doesn't attack, he doesn't commit crimes, he's depicted as offensive purely by maintaining the system and that is given as reason to attack, not just challenge him in a fight then he comes in swinging, you affirmatively start beating on a guy standing there because he is a capitalist.
and like that's crude but it makes sense. If you are an anticapitalist you aren't mad because (or only because) capitalists don't file their taxes or break environmental laws or even kidnap people. You believe the structure fundementally causes harm by its existence and its all legal. You have to be the aggressor because you can't just hope they'll break a law and hope they become a fair target and because of it the anticapitalist becomes the criminal, law breaker or even breaker of the peace. Seen as an outsider for pushing for change