50% of all dogs are sons of bitches
You’re either a bitch or a son of a bitch. A metaphor for life it seems.
Lmao good point. Genuinely puzzling question
Every dad is a mother fucker
No, only if they fuck again after the kid is born
Well, being a dad implies that there already is a kid born
Adoption, artificial insemination
I mean, if they are doing that they've already tried to make one the usual way. As far as hetero couples go tho.
Gay adoptive parents is the exception.
Also asexual people and people whose disabilities hinder them from having sex.
Sperm donors.
Of a nuclear family^
Urm actually, 🤓☝️ every dad is a wife fucker, he doesn't fuck his own mom, he's only a mother fucker from your presepective 🤓🤓☝️
A mom is someone who has birthed a child regardless of marriage status. Once the child is born the birthing female becomes a mom, and the male who provided the seed becomes the dad. This means that once the male becomes a dad, he has fucked someone who is now a mother.
Yeah i see your point i guess
Tbf it doesn't mean he fucked her while she was a mother
50% of the time you flip heads.
Flipped 10 tails in a row in 2010 and never flipped again.
100% babyyyyy
If you flipped tails again today the streak continues.
Nice, hit 1/1000 shot.
Aren’t dogs boys and cats girls?
Understandable
So I wasn't the only one who thought that as kid, god..
And yet the most popular cartoon cats are male. Garfield, Felix, Tom.
My horse is one of them
Bitch's are 100% Dogs!
It's actually about 51% that are male, just like in humans. The more you know! 🌈
Repost, that was done here barely a month ago
This gets reposted every couple of weeks
Oh nice I was too lazy to find it but I saw it xD
Oh lol, ig it's quite a common shower thought
Repost someone already did it this year
And so are their owners.
I don't mess with em
“Do you blame their mothers for their corruption?”
My dad calls our cat Cosmo a son of a bitch and I let him know that that is impossible.
Cosmo is the son of a Queen. ( female cats are referred to as Queens , sometimes when they are sterilized as Mollies.)
🙏❤️
If those dogs look remorseful after pooping on the floor, they're sorry son's of bitches
50 percent of shower thoughts are reposts
In a literal sense. If you consider that "bitch" is the term for a female dog, then approximately 50% of all dogs are male and thus can be called "sons of bitches."
In the kids movie Cats & Dogs a dog swears "Son of my mom!".
The other half may not be so nice either…
Have I lost my mind? All dogs have mothers so 100% of dogs are sons of bitches, right?
Technically they are pups of bitches.
Not necessarily. There are selective puppy killers out there.
intresting , would think 100 %
A lot of them are daughters of bitches.
o yes missed the son part lol
How old is OP? Thirteen?
Incorrect. All dogs are sons of bitches.
but what if they're female? wouldn't that make them daughters of bitches?
Man. You do realise that female dogs are called bitches. Right? The moment you mentioned bitches in a conversation about dogs, you had made the demarcation right there.
...But not all dogs are sons.
No. You dimwit. All dogs are sons and all bitches are daughters. That is how it is for my linguistic plane.
Is this real life? 👀
Look at your sentence. You said "all dogs are sons of bitches." Look at your first four words. You said ALL DOGS ARE SONS. And then you doubled down by saying it again. However, you also used the phrase "bitches are daughters." So there are daughters, right? Therefore those daughters come from bitches. Like you said. But you also said all dogs are sons of the aforementioned bitches.
All bitches are indeed daughters. Thus, those bitches too are daughters of bitches. They are females born of females who were born of females who were born of females. Not all dogs are SONS of bitches. As someone previously mentioned, some dogs are daughters of bitches. In fact, nearly 50% of them are. Yes I understand what you're saying when you say the word bitches. But there are sons, and there are daughters. Of bitches. They are not all sons.
You've got to be trolling. I can't understand how you could possibly not see that what you said is incorrect.
This is wild.
Man! You really went confidently here. Didn't you? I see that both your statistics and your grammar, are as bad as your reasoning.
The basic premise here is that we introduced gender into the mix for dogs, in which we generally have both males and females referred as one. Thus, in that case we can say that "50% of dogs are sons of female dogs".
Once you say there is a separate reference name for females of that species, you demarcate between the males of the species "dogs" and females of the species "bitches". Thus, now referring to female dogs as part of the dog population breaks your own demarcation. Based on your linguistic premise, now we have a 100% male population of dogs and a separate 100% female population of bitches.
Based on above, we can definitely make the following statements: 1. All dogs are sons of bitches. (This is biologically and statistically accurate) 2. All bitches are daughters of bitches. (This is also true going by above) 3. All dogs are sons of dogs. (This refers to lack of homosexual reproduction in the canine population) 4. All bitches are daughters of dogs. (Same as above)
If you are gonna reply now, please do make sure you address my point about linguistic demarcation. Thanks!
"...in which we generally have both males and females referred [sic] as one."
That's the problem. We do not refer to both males and females as one.
Check the upvotes and downvotes here, and you will see who is being supported and who is bananas.
Other people here are welcome to comment on your statement that all dogs are sons.
If downvotes and vote of majority was how we did science, math, and reasoning, then I am pretty sure we would have scientific principles altered, because apparently logic works in favor of upvotes.
You do realise female dogs are not sons, right?
You do realise 100% of bitches will be daughters of bitches?
yes?
The other 50% are bitches. Which is better?