www.bostonglobe.com/2024/07/01/metro/karen-read-verdict/?s_campaign=audience:reddit
With the jury deadlocked, the judge has declared a mistrial in Karen Read case
ArticlesView all comments
I had a debate with someone on Saturday who just wouldn’t budge from guilty. (“She said she did it”, DNA on tail light, and fundamentally didn’t believe a conspiracy of that size was possible). She also didn’t like Karen Read, thought Albert’s sitting with O’Keefe family was informative, and thought having a “sleazy” lawyer was indicative of something negative. That was enough for her and she would not budge. Woman was educated and highly entrenched in state government/courts.
It was frustrating but shows how a hung jury can happen.
People really hang on the she said she did it, which is funny to me It’s not like Karen got on the stand and said it or said it in an interview with the police.
Jen said she said that. The one EMT said she said something similar. That’s it.
Which okay, maybe she did, or maybe those people are unreliable. We can’t really say. There’s Reasonable doubt even with that statement.
Jen, Kerry, a firefighter and an EMT. That's four people. Both Jen and Kerry testified to the broken taillight as well.
Well that’s not correct but whatever. It doesn’t matter
Apparently neither do the facts of who testified to what.
I could spend the time giving you time stamps to their testimony to prove you are wrong and give you the quotes of what they actually said. I think it would probably be a waste of my time because I doubt it would change your mind. You’d just probably argue something else.
I’m tired of wilfully ignorant people who don’t bother to fact check their own statements.
So you're sticking with Jen was the only one, and an EMT who said anything similar? I know you're hanging on "they didn't use those exact words," so I get it, but there were four who said something substantially similar. I watched them testify.
Google is free and so is the testimony on YouTube. Argue about it with someone else