User deleted post
View all comments
Whose? Morals are subjective to the person holding them. What you think constitutes morality may not jive with someone else's ideas.
What you're actually asking with this question is "How come nobody seems to have the same set of morals I do?"
User deleted comment
18d
Morality is defined as "A person's standard of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do." - It literally boils down to the individual's interpretation of the world around them.
Just because certain things seem to be universally accepted as moral, which indicates an objective component, cultural differences across the globe accept and reject so many different concepts that applying the same rules to everyone is literally how the world has gotten to be so much of a friggin' mess.
For example your demanding that something like pornography is amoral and nobody should think otherwise is a bigger problem than my literal interpretation of the concept, since you're trying to force your idea of what is and isn't moral on everybody.
User deleted comment
18d
"explain the benefits of porn and theft." - benefit doesn't necessarily equate to morality, but I'll play along anyway.
What about the classic story of Robin Hood? Stealing from the rich, giving to the poor? Would that tactic not justify theft as a moral behavior? It would seem to me that helping people in need is about as moral as it comes.
As for pornography- As long as we're talking about activities that are consensually performed ane legally disseminated....what exactly is amoral about it? Just because I don't like or understand something doesn't mean that it should be universally considered amoral. To say otherwise is extremely dangerous.